has not contained

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "has not contained" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that something has not included or held certain elements or information up to the present time. Example: "The report has not contained any significant errors, which is a relief for the team."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

5 human-written examples

And when it comes to fighting violent extremism, the almost fearful passive tolerance of religious extremism that has allowed segregated communities to behave in ways that run completely counter to our values has not contained that extremism but allowed it to grow and prosper".

The Guardian

One-step method has not contained the drying and dispersing processes which are vulnerable to form agglomeration of nanoparticles.

Nanoscale Research Letters

The Affordable Care Act (ACA) has not contained costs and prices, but instead has allowed insurers and the drug industry to continue to profiteer at patients' expense.

Huffington Post

Since 2001, the vaccine has not contained preservatives, protein-derived stabilizers or human serum albumin.

Human Vaccines and Immunotherapeutics

Petrol sold in Sweden after 1994 has not contained lead (National Swedish Environment Protection Agency Swedish Petroleum Institutee), and the decrease in B-Pb levels in children in Landskrona and Trelleborg reflects the gradual reduction of the use of leaded petrol [ 2- 4].

BMC Public Health

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

52 human-written examples

Its previous coverage of the film hasn't contained any spoilers.

Huffington Post

He also wondered why the Army had not contained the protesters more effectively.

The New Yorker

To date, however, those buckyballs have not contained any extraterrestrial gases.

The New York Times

The $99 Zire has a new sleek housing but offers no software features that previous Palms have not contained.

The New York Times

Before accepting such claims at face value, let's remind ourselves of what the leaks so far have not contained.

The New Yorker

In 1988, there was a huge melt, which would almost certainly have flooded the southern marshes if the dam had not contained the worst of it.

The New Yorker

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "has not contained", ensure that the context clearly specifies what is missing and why it is relevant. For instance, "The updated report has not contained the crucial financial data needed for analysis."

Common error

Avoid using "has not contained" in overly complex sentences where simpler alternatives like "lacked" or "did not include" would improve clarity. For example, instead of "The presentation, which was intended to provide a comprehensive overview, has not contained all the relevant statistics", try "The presentation lacked all the relevant statistics".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "has not contained" functions as a negative predicate in sentences, indicating the absence of something within a subject. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and usability in written English. Examples show its use in diverse contexts, from describing the contents of vaccines to the features of software.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

40%

Science

40%

Formal & Business

20%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "has not contained" is a grammatically sound and usable expression for indicating the absence of specific elements or information, as validated by Ludwig. While not exceedingly common, its usage is spread across various domains, including news, science, and formal communications. Ludwig examples clarify its function in specifying what is missing from a particular subject, such as a report, vaccine, or software. To improve clarity and impact, one should consider using simpler alternatives in complex sentences and ensure that the context clearly specifies what is missing. Overall, the phrase provides a clear and factual way to specify a lack of inclusion.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

did not include

Emphasizes the absence of something as a deliberate choice or omission.

has lacked

Highlights the absence of something necessary or desirable.

did not have

A more general way to express the absence of something.

has been without

Focuses on the state of being without something over a period.

has not incorporated

Indicates a failure to integrate something into a larger whole.

has not encompassed

Suggests that something has not been fully covered or included within a certain scope.

has not embodied

Implies the absence of certain qualities or characteristics.

has omitted

Highlights the intentional leaving out of specific details or components.

has excluded

Focuses on the deliberate act of preventing something from being included.

failed to hold

Emphasizes the inability to retain or contain something physically or conceptually.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "has not contained" to sound more formal?

For a more formal tone, consider using alternatives such as "has not included", "did not incorporate", or "failed to encompass" depending on the specific context.

What's a simpler way to say "has not contained"?

Simpler alternatives include "did not have" or "lacked". These options are more direct and easier to understand in most contexts.

Is there a difference between "has not contained" and "does not contain"?

"Has not contained" implies that something previously might have held something but no longer does, while "does not contain" refers to the present state. For example, "The vaccine has not contained preservatives since 2001" indicates a change over time.

Can "has not contained" be used in active voice?

Yes, "has not contained" is already in the active voice. It indicates that the subject (e.g., "the report", "the vaccine") has not performed the action of containing something. It is grammatically correct as is.