has not been implicated

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "has not been implicated" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing someone's involvement or association with a particular event or situation, especially in legal or investigative contexts. Example: "Despite the ongoing investigation, she has not been implicated in any wrongdoing."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Mr. Pataki has not been implicated in the case.

The New York Times

The management has not been implicated, he said.

The New York Times

Mr. Sosa has not been implicated in the investigation.

The New York Times

Obama has not been implicated in this case.

The Washington Post

He has not been implicated in the scandal.

The Economist

Mr. Fazazi has not been implicated directly in the attacks or charged with a crime.

The New York Times

Mr. El-Hage has not been implicated in the recent assault on the guard.

The New York Times

Dr. Stewart, a podiatrist, has not been implicated directly in this scandal.

The New York Times

The president herself has not been implicated in the Petrobras scandal.

The Guardian - Opinion

Rousseff has not been implicated, but several close aides are either in prison or under investigation.

The Guardian

Verizon has not been implicated in the theft, a point Mr. Gerace made in his letter.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "has not been implicated", ensure the context clearly indicates what the person or entity has not been implicated in. Specifying the event or situation is crucial for clarity.

Common error

Avoid using "has not been implicated" without specifying what the subject is not implicated in. The phrase loses its impact if the context is unclear.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "has not been implicated" functions as a verbal phrase indicating that a person or entity has not been shown to be involved or connected to a particular situation, often one involving wrongdoing. Ludwig AI confirms its usage in contexts where accountability or culpability is being assessed.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

59%

Science

39%

Formal & Business

2%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "has not been implicated" is a commonly used phrase to indicate a lack of involvement, especially in negative situations. According to Ludwig AI, it's grammatically correct and primarily found in News & Media and Scientific contexts, reflecting its use in formal and neutral registers. While alternatives like "has not been involved" exist, "has not been implicated" carries a specific connotation of non-involvement in potential wrongdoing. Ensure the context clarifies what the subject has not been implicated in to avoid vagueness.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

has not been involved

Replaces 'implicated' with a more general term for involvement.

has not been connected

Focuses on the absence of a link or association.

has not been associated

Highlights the lack of any direct association.

has not been linked

Emphasizes the absence of a link, often in an investigative context.

is not under suspicion

Shifts the focus to the absence of suspicion.

has not been charged

Specifically indicates that no formal charges have been filed.

has not been accused

Highlights the absence of formal accusations.

remains uninvolved

Emphasizes a continued state of non-involvement.

is not a suspect

Directly states that the person is not considered a suspect.

has no connection to

Highlights the absence of any form of connection.

FAQs

How can I use "has not been implicated" in a sentence?

Use "has not been implicated" to indicate that someone or something has not been shown to be involved in a particular situation, especially one involving wrongdoing. For example, "The CEO "has not been implicated" in the fraud investigation."

What's the difference between "has not been implicated" and "has not been involved"?

"Has not been implicated" suggests a lack of connection to something negative, like a crime or scandal. "Has not been involved" is more general and simply means there was no participation in something, whether positive or negative.

What can I say instead of "has not been implicated"?

You can use alternatives like "has not been linked", "is not under suspicion", or "remains uninvolved" depending on the specific context.

Is it appropriate to use "has not been implicated" in formal writing?

Yes, "has not been implicated" is suitable for formal writing, especially in legal, journalistic, or academic contexts. It conveys a precise meaning of non-involvement in a potentially negative situation.