has not allowed

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "has not allowed" is correct and usable in written English.
You would use it in a sentence when you are talking about something that has been prevented or prohibited. For example, "The new lockdown regulations have not allowed me to visit my family in person."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Sports

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Myers has not allowed a hit.

The New York Times

He has not allowed a postseason home run since 2000.

The New York Times - Sports

The bullpen has not allowed a run in 13 innings.

The New York Times - Sports

The government has not allowed journalists to visit Zinjibar.

The Washington Post

Five times, he has not allowed any runs at all.

The New York Times - Sports

Ruiz has not allowed opponents to look good, either.

The New York Times - Sports

Yet Congress has not allowed even a modest tweaking.

The New York Times

Beene has not allowed a goal in 617 minutes.

The New York Times - Sports

Wagner has not allowed a run in five appearances.

The New York Times - Sports

However, the Syrian regime has not allowed this.

The Guardian

Wakefield has not allowed a run in 15 consecutive innings.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "has not allowed" when indicating a deliberate act of preventing something or someone from doing something. Ensure the context clearly identifies who or what is being prevented and the reason behind the prevention.

Common error

Avoid using "has not allowed" in situations where the active voice would be more direct and impactful. For instance, instead of "The application has not allowed access", write "The application denies access" for a more concise statement.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "has not allowed" functions as a verb phrase indicating a negation of permission or authorization. It's used to express that someone or something has been prevented from doing something. As demonstrated in Ludwig, this construction is widely applicable in various contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Sports

25%

Academia

15%

Less common in

Science

5%

Formal & Business

3%

Encyclopedias

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "has not allowed" is a grammatically sound and frequently used construction that indicates a prevention or prohibition. Ludwig AI confirms its validity and applicability across various domains. It is most commonly found in news and media, sports, and academic contexts. For alternative phrasing, consider options like "did not permit" or "prevented from" to fit the specific tone and emphasis required. When using the phrase, ensure clarity about who or what is being prevented and why, and avoid passive voice constructions for more directness.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

did not permit

Replaces "allowed" with "permit", focusing on formal authorization.

did not let

Uses "let" instead of "allow", creating a more informal tone.

forbade

Emphasizes a stronger sense of prohibition compared to "allowed".

prevented from

Focuses on the act of stopping something from happening.

did not authorize

Highlights the lack of official approval or permission.

blocked from

Implies a physical or metaphorical obstruction.

prohibited from

Emphasizes the legal or formal restriction.

refused to permit

Highlights the unwillingness to grant permission.

denied the opportunity to

Focuses on withholding a chance or possibility.

did not grant permission for

Directly states the lack of permission given.

FAQs

How can I use "has not allowed" in a sentence?

Use "has not allowed" to indicate that someone or something has been prevented or prohibited from doing something. For example, "The government "has not allowed" journalists to visit the restricted area".

What are some alternatives to saying "has not allowed"?

You can use alternatives such as "did not permit", "forbade", or "prevented from" depending on the specific context and desired level of formality.

Is there a difference between "has not allowed" and "did not allow"?

"Has not allowed" implies a continuing state or a recent action with ongoing consequences, while "did not allow" refers to a completed action in the past. The choice depends on whether the prohibition is still in effect. For example, "The company "has not allowed" remote work since the policy change" versus "The company "did not allow" remote work before the policy change".

Can "has not allowed" be used in formal writing?

Yes, "has not allowed" is appropriate for formal writing. It is a grammatically correct and clear way to express that permission or access has been denied. More formal synonyms like "did not authorize" can also be considered for added emphasis.