has not achieved

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "has not achieved" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that someone or something has not reached a particular goal or level of success. Example: "Despite her efforts, she has not achieved the desired results in her research."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

This he has not achieved.

The Economist

He has not achieved that aim.

The Guardian

Even the bank's supporters say it has not achieved enough.

The New York Times

That's not to say TechCity has not achieved anything.

The Guardian

Still, there are things that Ahmet has not achieved.

The New Yorker

Mr. bin Laden has not achieved his more ambitious goals.

The New York Times

But Trump has not achieved much on the legislative front.

The Washington Post

Dr. Putterman has not achieved fusion in his experiments.

The New York Times - Science

He has not achieved what has been expected of him.

The New York Times

This act of terror has not achieved its goal," he said on Friday.

The Guardian

"It has not achieved what the country and the people need".

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "has not achieved", ensure the context clearly specifies what goal or outcome was not met. Provide specific details to avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "has not achieved" without clearly stating what was not achieved. For example, instead of saying "The project has not achieved", specify "The project has not achieved its initial goals."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "has not achieved" functions as a negative verb phrase, indicating the absence of accomplishment or attainment of a specified goal or outcome. This is supported by Ludwig, which confirms its grammatical correctness and usability across various contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

56%

Science

25%

Formal & Business

6%

Less common in

Wiki

3%

Opinion

3%

Arts

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "has not achieved" is a versatile and grammatically sound phrase used to denote a lack of accomplishment or attainment. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and wide applicability. Its neutral tone makes it suitable for various registers, from formal reports to news articles. The phrase is most commonly found in News & Media and Scientific contexts. When using "has not achieved", clarity is key; always specify what goal or outcome was not met to avoid ambiguity. Alternatives like "failed to attain" and "did not accomplish" offer nuanced ways to express a similar meaning.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

did not accomplish

Focuses on the lack of completion of a task or objective.

failed to attain

Emphasizes the failure in reaching a specific goal.

has fallen short of

Highlights the discrepancy between the target and the actual outcome.

did not manage to

Focuses on the lack of capability to achieve a specific result.

has not realized

Implies a lack of fulfillment of expectations or potential.

has been unable to reach

Indicates an inability to attain a certain level or standard.

has not been successful in

Explicitly states the lack of success in a particular area.

remains unfulfilled

Highlights the ongoing state of incompletion or lack of achievement.

has yet to secure

Suggests that success is still possible but has not happened yet.

is still lacking

Emphasizes the absence of something necessary for achievement.

FAQs

How to use "has not achieved" in a sentence?

Use "has not achieved" to indicate that someone or something has failed to reach a specific goal or outcome. For example, "The company "has not achieved" its sales targets this quarter."

What can I say instead of "has not achieved"?

You can use alternatives such as "failed to attain", "did not accomplish", or "has fallen short of" depending on the context.

Is it better to say "did not achieve" or "has not achieved"?

Both "did not achieve" and ""has not achieved"" are grammatically correct, but ""has not achieved"" implies a continuing state or relevance to the present, whereas "did not achieve" refers to a completed action in the past.

What's the difference between "has not achieved" and "failed to achieve"?

"Failed to achieve" often implies a stronger sense of inability or difficulty, while ""has not achieved"" is a more neutral statement of fact. The best choice depends on the specific nuance you want to convey.