has no stake

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase 'has no stake' is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that someone is not involved in an activity or has no rights or interests in relation to something. For example: "As the company is not owned by him, he has no stake in the final decision."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

41 human-written examples

(He has no stake, however, in LIV).

The New York Times - Sports

America has no stake in these fights.

The New Yorker

He has no stake in making false claims.

The Washington Post

France's government has no stake in Arcelor; nor has it any regulatory role to play.

The Economist

But to argue that Big Oil has no stake in shale gas is simply false.

The New York Times

Often, it is helpful to have someone who has no stake in the outcome assist in managing the conversation.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

19 human-written examples

The district as such has no stakes of its own to be represented.

Encyclopedia Britannica

It's not that the Hershey meeting has no stakes.

Huffington Post

Redmond had no stake in the decision.

The Washington Post

We have no stake in that.

The New York Times

I didn't own anything; I had no stake.

The Guardian - Books

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "has no stake" to clearly communicate a lack of vested interest or involvement in a particular situation or outcome. It's particularly effective when emphasizing neutrality or impartiality.

Common error

Avoid using "has no stake" when the intended meaning is simply a lack of knowledge or awareness. "Stake" implies a vested interest, right, or potential gain or loss. If someone is merely uninformed, use phrases like "is unaware" or "is unfamiliar" instead.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "has no stake" primarily functions as a declarative statement, indicating the absence of an interest, right, or potential gain or loss in a particular situation. Ludwig's examples illustrate its use in various contexts, such as financial investments, political affairs, and personal relationships.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

70%

Academia

15%

Formal & Business

5%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

3%

Wiki

3%

Science

4%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "has no stake" is a versatile expression used to denote a lack of vested interest or involvement in a situation. As confirmed by Ludwig, it is grammatically sound and commonly used across various domains, including news, academia, and business. While often used interchangeably with phrases like "has no interest" or "has no involvement", it is important to ensure that its usage aligns with the presence of a potential gain or loss, as "stake" specifically implies a personal investment. To avoid misinterpretations, it is advisable to exercise caution when deploying the phrase, especially in formal contexts.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

has no interest

Emphasizes a lack of concern or enthusiasm.

has no involvement

Focuses on the absence of participation or engagement.

has no part

Highlights the lack of a role or contribution.

has no share

Indicates a lack of ownership or entitlement.

is not invested

Suggests a lack of financial or emotional commitment.

is not implicated

Implies freedom from blame or responsibility.

is unconcerned

Highlights a lack of worry or anxiety.

is disinterested

Focuses on the lack of bias or personal gain.

is detached

Emphasizes emotional distance or neutrality.

bears no responsibility

Highlights a lack of obligation or accountability.

FAQs

What does it mean when someone "has no stake" in something?

It means they don't have any personal or financial interest, involvement, or potential gain or loss related to it.

How can I use "has no stake" in a sentence?

For example: "The mediator "has no stake" in the outcome, ensuring a fair and unbiased process."

What's a more formal way to say "has no stake"?

More formal alternatives include "has no interest", "has no involvement", or "is disinterested depending on the specific context".

Is it correct to say "have no stake" instead of "has no stake"?

Yes, but the correct form depends on the subject. Use "has no stake" for singular subjects (e.g., "he", "she", "it") and "have no stake" for plural subjects (e.g., "they", "we"). For example: "They "have no stake" in the company."