has no grounds

USAGE SUMMARY

"has no grounds" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you want to express that something has no logical justification or basis for it. For example: "His decision to leave the job has no grounds, as he had a steady paycheck and a good work environment."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

37 human-written examples

It has no grounds, no basis.

The Washington Post

Based on the record, it has no grounds to criticize the U.S.

Columbia University

Therefore, they said, the city has no grounds for a claim.

The New York Times

The Conservative Party's finances are looking better, but it has no grounds for complacency, either.

The Economist

It was one of those tournament injustices for which the victim has no grounds of appeal.

The New York Times - Sports

The company contends a health-care provider has no grounds for suing it for exceeding Medicaid price limits.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

23 human-written examples

Cameron has no ground troops in Syria – his own or anyone else's.

The Guardian - Opinion

Mr. Sanders's own political career illustrates what can happen when a revolutionary has no ground troops.

The New York Times

"This is blatant scaremongering from Number 10 that has no grounding in reality," said Matthew Elliott, the group's chief executive.

Independent

She sees and understands, but her counsel is never sought and she has no ground upon which to act.

The New York Times

The invocation of a "global war on terror" is a big-lie propaganda device that has no grounding in reality.

Huffington Post

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "has no grounds" to clearly and directly state that a claim, action, or belief lacks a valid basis or justification. This phrase is suitable for both formal and informal contexts.

Common error

Avoid using "has no grounds" simply to express disagreement with someone's opinion. The phrase implies an objective lack of factual or logical basis, not merely a difference in viewpoint.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "has no grounds" functions as a predicate, asserting that a subject lacks a valid justification or reason. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's grammatically sound and commonly used. Examples show it applied to claims, lawsuits, and actions.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

86%

Science

7%

Formal & Business

7%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "has no grounds" is a grammatically correct and commonly used expression to indicate a lack of justification or valid reason. Ludwig AI confirms its usability in various contexts. Predominantly found in news and media sources, it serves to express disagreement or dismissal by undermining the subject in question. Related phrases include "lacks justification" and "is baseless". When using this phrase, remember that it suggests an objective absence of support, rather than a mere difference in opinion.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

is baseless

Emphasizes the absence of any factual or logical support.

is not justified

Passive voice construction emphasizing the lack of justification.

lacks justification

Replaces "has no grounds" with a more concise term emphasizing the absence of a valid reason.

is unwarranted

Focuses on the lack of necessity or justification for something.

is unsupported

Highlights the absence of evidence or proof.

offers no justification

Focuses on the action of providing justification and the failure to do so.

is without foundation

Uses a different metaphor to convey the idea of lacking a solid base or rationale.

is not supported by evidence

Specifically points to the lack of evidentiary support.

is indefensible

Suggests that something cannot be justified or defended.

is not based on reality

Highlights that the argument or claim is detached from the truth.

FAQs

How to use "has no grounds" in a sentence?

You can use "has no grounds" to indicate that a claim, action, or belief lacks a valid basis or justification. For example, "The lawsuit "has no grounds" because there is no evidence of wrongdoing."

What can I say instead of "has no grounds"?

You can use alternatives like "lacks justification", "is baseless", or "is unwarranted depending on the specific context.

Which is correct, "has no grounds" or "have no grounds"?

"Has no grounds" is used when referring to a singular subject, while "have no grounds" is used with plural subjects or the pronouns 'I', 'you', 'we', and 'they'. For example, 'The claim "has no grounds"', but 'They "have no grounds" for complaint'.

What's the difference between "has no grounds" and "has no basis"?

The phrases ""has no grounds"" and "has no basis" are largely synonymous. Both indicate a lack of justification or foundation. The choice between them often depends on stylistic preference or the specific nuance you want to convey.