has no equal

USAGE SUMMARY

"has no equal" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
You can use it to express that something is incomparable or that nothing compares to it. For example: "The love she has for her family has no equal."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

Frankly, it has no equal".

The New York Times

As far as I'm concerned, he has no equal.

The Guardian - Music

"He has no equal in the assembly," Rifaat continued.

The New Yorker

In warmth and twinkle he has no equal.

The Guardian

As an industry gathering, Detroit has no equal.

The New York Times

As a figure of ravishing sadness, Mr. Leung's gentle newspaperman, Chow Mo Wan, has no equal.

The New York Times

That's why British asparagus in May and June has no equal.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

"The Stones," he wrote, "present a theatrical-musical performance that has no equal in our culture".

The New Yorker

Among contemporary scientists Dr. Thomas has no equal as a literary stylist.

The New Yorker

In that balancing of the aesthetic scales, Sander has no equal.

The New Yorker

This movie, a one-of-a-kind French time capsule from 1971, has no equal.

The Guardian - Film

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When employing the phrase "has no equal", ensure the context clearly indicates the specific area in which the subject excels. This prevents ambiguity and strengthens your claim.

Common error

Avoid using "has no equal" for commonplace situations. Reserve it for truly exceptional cases to maintain its impact and avoid sounding hyperbolic.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "has no equal" functions as a qualitative descriptor, emphasizing the unparalleled nature of a subject. It positions the subject as uniquely superior, implying that it cannot be matched in a specific attribute or overall quality. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase is grammatically correct and effective for highlighting exceptional qualities.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

74%

Science

15%

Formal & Business

3%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

1%

Wiki

1%

Reference

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "has no equal" is a grammatically correct and widely used expression to emphasize the unparalleled nature of a subject. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, it effectively conveys that something is incomparable or uniquely superior. Predominantly found in News & Media, but also in Science and Formal & Business contexts, this phrase is best reserved for truly exceptional cases to retain its impact. Alternatives such as "is unmatched" or "is unparalleled" can offer similar emphasis. Remember to avoid overuse and ensure contextual clarity when employing this powerful descriptor.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

is unmatched

Emphasizes the lack of a direct comparison due to superior qualities.

is unparalleled

Highlights the absence of a parallel or equivalent.

is unrivaled

Focuses on the lack of competition or rivalry.

is incomparable

Stresses the impossibility of comparing due to distinctiveness.

is second to none

Indicates being the best or foremost in a particular area.

stands alone

Highlights the unique and solitary nature of the subject.

is in a league of its own

Suggests a level of excellence that surpasses all others.

there's nothing like it

Emphasizes the distinctiveness and lack of substitutes.

cannot be matched

Highlights the inability of anything else to reach the same level.

is preeminent

Stresses superior rank or importance.

FAQs

How can I use "has no equal" in a sentence?

You can use "has no equal" to describe something that is unmatched or unparalleled. For example: "In terms of innovation, this company "has no equal"".

What are some alternatives to "has no equal"?

Alternatives include "is unmatched", "is unparalleled", or "is second to none", depending on the specific nuance you wish to convey.

Is it correct to say "have no equal"?

No, "have no equal" is grammatically incorrect when referring to a singular subject. The correct form is "has no equal". However, "have no equal" can be used for plural subjects, such as "These teams have no equal".

What does it mean when something is described as having "no equal"?

It means that the thing being described is unique in some way, and that nothing else compares to it in terms of quality, skill, or another attribute. It indicates exceptional superiority.