has modest efficacy

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "has modest efficacy" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe the effectiveness of a treatment, intervention, or method that produces some positive results, but not to a significant degree. Example: "The new medication has modest efficacy in reducing symptoms, but further research is needed to determine its overall impact."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

3 human-written examples

Guanfacine, another α-2 adrenergic agonist, has modest efficacy in reducing tics and in improving attention in children and adolescents.

European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry

This inhibitor has modest efficacy, and thus this study is a starting point for the design and selection of more potent inhibitors.

ACS Chemical Biology

Although interleukin-11 (IL-11), a hematopoietic growth factor with thrombopoietic activity, is approved for the treatment of CIT in the US, it is not approved in the EU, it has modest efficacy, and it produces substantial adverse effects that limit its use [ 12- 14].

BMC Cancer

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

57 human-written examples

Antidepressants have modest efficacy in late-life depression (LLD), perhaps because various neurobiologic processes compromise frontolimbic networks required for antidepressant response.

The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry

Our results are consistent with studies suggesting that neuraminidase inhibitors have modest efficacy and should be optional for healthy adults during typical influenza seasons yet recommended for high risk adults and epidemic situations with more virulent strains [17], [18], [19].

Plosone

Although sorafenib had modest efficacy in melanoma, these results suggest a correlation between exposure and efficacy of sorafenib.

British Journal of Cancer

Psychotropic medications have modest efficacy and can lead to undesired side effects [ 9– 11] but they are frequently used to treat BPSD [ 12– 15].

BioMed Research International

For vascular dementia, treatment is largely symptomatic, and various agents reported to have modest efficacy include nicergoline, piracetam, oxiracetam, citicoline, pentoxifylline, propentofylline, aspirin, triflusal, and Ginkgo biloba [ 11].

BioMed Research International

In chronic disease such as SLE where a number of treatments have proved to have modest efficacy, adverse effects associated with treatment have a significant influence on the choice of treatment.

Arthritis Research and Therapy

Evidence-based pharmacological medications have modest efficacy [ 51] and even doctors experience frustration with IBS, due as much to medical uncertainty and shortage of effective interventions as to intolerance of the personal characteristics of IBS patients [ 50].

BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine

Updated 2015 recommendations: Type 1 histamine receptor inverse agonists (type 1 antihistamines) have modest efficacy against pruritus, either alone or in combination with each other, but their effect appears to be variable between individuals.

BMC Veterinary Research

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "has modest efficacy", provide context about why the efficacy is limited. Is it due to the complexity of the problem, limitations of the method, or other factors? This provides a more nuanced understanding.

Common error

Avoid exaggerating the benefits when using "has modest efficacy". It's important to accurately represent the limited nature of the effect to maintain credibility and avoid misleading the audience.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "has modest efficacy" functions as a descriptive term. According to Ludwig AI, it describes the degree of effectiveness of something, typically a treatment, intervention, or method. It indicates that the subject in question produces some positive results, but not to a significant degree.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

100%

Less common in

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Academia

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "has modest efficacy" is a useful term for accurately describing situations where an intervention or treatment provides some benefit, but not to a substantial degree. Ludwig AI confirms it is grammatically correct and usable in written English. It's commonly found in scientific and medical contexts. Remember to provide context when using this phrase, explaining the reasons behind the limited efficacy. Alternatives such as "shows limited effectiveness" or "exhibits slight benefit" can be used to convey a similar meaning. When writing, avoid exaggerating the benefits and ensure accurate representation of the treatment's effects.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

shows limited effectiveness

Focuses on the limited degree of positive outcome.

exhibits slight benefit

Highlights the small degree of improvement or advantage.

offers marginal improvement

Emphasizes that the improvement is barely noticeable or significant.

provides some utility

Suggests a degree of usefulness, though not substantial.

possesses limited impact

Indicates a low degree of influence or effect.

demonstrates partial success

Highlights that the outcome is only partly achieved.

achieves moderate results

Suggests results that are neither excellent nor poor, but somewhere in between.

yields limited results

Focuses on the small amount of output or achievement.

has a mild effect

Emphasizes the gentle or weak nature of the effect.

shows a degree of effectiveness

Indicates some level of effectiveness, although not specified as strong or complete.

FAQs

How can I use "has modest efficacy" in a sentence?

You can use "has modest efficacy" to describe treatments, interventions, or methods that show some positive results, but not to a significant degree. For example, "The new drug "has modest efficacy" in reducing symptoms, but further research is needed."

What are some alternatives to "has modest efficacy"?

Alternatives include "shows limited effectiveness", "exhibits slight benefit", or "offers marginal improvement". These phrases all convey a similar meaning of limited or partial success.

Is it appropriate to use "has modest efficacy" in formal writing?

Yes, "has modest efficacy" is appropriate for formal writing, especially in scientific or medical contexts where precise and objective language is important. It accurately conveys a specific level of effectiveness.

What's the difference between "has modest efficacy" and "is ineffective"?

"Has modest efficacy" indicates some level of positive effect, even if small. "Is ineffective" means there is no discernible positive effect at all. The former suggests potential for further improvement, while the latter suggests abandoning the approach.