has limited time

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "has limited time" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe a situation or an individual that does not have much time available for a task or activity. Example: "The project has limited time for completion, so we need to work efficiently to meet the deadline."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

22 human-written examples

He has limited time to lead the way.

The New York Times

Kaling has limited time for a personal life.

The New York Times - Magazine

The mayor has limited time and appetite for squeezing campaign appearances into a schedule crammed with funerals and news briefings.

The New York Times

Because the orchestra consists of members of the busy Vienna State Opera Orchestra, it has limited time for rehearsals and concerts.

The New York Times - Arts

But as a full-time student and working mother of two daughters, 17 and 13, Ms. Hansen said she has limited time for heavy campaigning.

The New York Times

"With 41 days left, Mitt Romney has limited time to level with the American people about what he'd do if elected," Ms. Smith said.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

37 human-written examples

"People have limited time.

The New York Times

They have limited time.

The New Yorker

People have limited time, memory and attention.

The New York Times

We have limited time, and we have to maximize it.

The New Yorker

The reporter was supposed to have limited time with McChrystal.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "has limited time" when emphasizing a real constraint. It's suitable for situations where deadlines or schedules are tight, and efficient use of time is crucial.

Common error

Avoid using "has limited time" when the time available is actually adequate. Overusing this phrase can diminish its impact and create unnecessary alarm. Be factual and precise about the time limitations.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "has limited time" functions as a modifier describing a subject's temporal constraint. Ludwig shows it commonly precedes an explanation of the consequences of this limitation, such as the need for efficiency or strategic prioritization.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

64%

Science

28%

Formal & Business

4%

Less common in

Wiki

4%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "has limited time" is a common and grammatically correct way to express that there is a restriction on the amount of time available. Ludwig AI confirms its broad usability across various contexts, particularly in News & Media and Science. When using this phrase, be specific about the time constraints and avoid exaggeration. Alternatives such as "short on time" or "pressed for time" can add nuance. This phrase effectively sets the stage for explanations or justifications related to actions taken under time pressure.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

has little time

A simpler, more direct way of expressing the same idea.

short on time

A more informal way of saying there is not enough time.

time is short

This phrase emphasizes the brevity of the available time.

constrained by time

This phrase highlights the restriction placed by the limited time available.

pressed for time

Implies a sense of urgency due to the lack of time.

time is of the essence

This idiom indicates that time is a critical factor and action is needed promptly.

running out of time

Suggests that the available time is quickly diminishing.

time is lacking

Indicates an insufficient amount of time.

faces a time crunch

Emphasizes a stressful situation due to limited time.

time-bound

Highlights that something is restricted to a certain timeframe.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "has limited time"?

You can use phrases such as "short on time", "time is short", or "pressed for time" depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it better to say "has limited time" or "has a limited amount of time"?

"Has limited time" is generally more concise and preferred. "Has a limited amount of time" is also correct but can sound slightly more verbose. The choice depends on the desired level of formality and emphasis.

When is it appropriate to use "has limited time" in a sentence?

It's appropriate when describing a person, project, or situation where the amount of time available is a significant constraint. For instance, "The project "has limited time" for completion, so efficiency is key."

What's the difference between "has limited time" and "is running out of time"?

"Has limited time" indicates a general constraint on the available time. "Is running out of time", however, suggests that the available time is actively diminishing, creating a sense of urgency. The latter implies a more immediate threat of not meeting a deadline.