has lasted for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "has lasted for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate a duration of time that something has been in existence. For example: "This friendship has lasted for over 10 years."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

58 human-written examples

Designed to last 30 years, it has lasted for almost 40.

The Washington Post

It has lasted for 14 months.

Independent

The viscosity reduction has lasted for 11 h.

Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering

The ensuing battle has lasted for more than two years.

The New York Times

Extend the Jets' misery, which has lasted for decades.

The New York Times - Sports

So the whole exercise has lasted for six long years.

The Guardian

Commercial development of coalbed methane (CBM) in China has lasted for a decade.

Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering

To end: The state of emergency in Algeria that has lasted for nineteen years.

The New Yorker

"An occupation that has lasted for almost 50 years must end".

Independent

The sentences concluded a case that has lasted for three years.

The New York Times

Now, after a lull that has lasted for more than a year, two-bedrooms are back.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "has lasted for" to clearly indicate the duration of an event, condition, or state, providing context to its temporal extent.

Common error

Avoid using past simple tense ("lasted for") when the action or state continues to the present. "Has lasted for" implies the duration extends up to now.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "has lasted for" functions as a verb phrase indicating the duration of an action or state that began in the past and continues into the present. Ludwig's examples demonstrate its use across various contexts, showing its versatility in describing different durations.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

49%

Science

35%

Academia

10%

Less common in

Wiki

3%

Formal & Business

2%

Reference

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "has lasted for" is a versatile and commonly used verb phrase that indicates the duration of something ongoing from the past to the present. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, it is grammatically correct and suitable for various contexts, including news, science, and academic writing. The phrase's neutral register makes it widely applicable. When using "has lasted for", ensure the event or state continues to the present. For variety, consider alternatives like "has continued for" or "has extended for". With over 60 examples in Ludwig, its frequency is classified as "very common" reinforcing its status as a reliable option for expressing duration.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

has continued for

Replaces "lasted" with "continued", emphasizing the ongoing nature of the duration.

has extended for

Substitutes "lasted" with "extended", highlighting the expansion of time.

has persisted for

Uses "persisted" instead of "lasted", stressing the endurance through time.

has endured for

Replaces "lasted" with "endured", focusing on withstanding challenges over time.

has remained for

Uses "remained" to emphasize the state of continuing for a certain duration.

has gone on for

Replaces "lasted" with "gone on", conveying the duration in a more conversational way.

has been in effect for

Replaces "lasted" focusing on the duration for being in effect or active.

has been ongoing for

Substitutes with an emphasize on the continuity of the duration.

has unfolded for

Uses "unfolded" to emphasize duration as the story progresses.

has played out for

Replaces "lasted" to highlight duration in a sequence of events.

FAQs

How do I use "has lasted for" in a sentence?

Use "has lasted for" to describe the duration of something that began in the past and continues to the present. For example, "The meeting "has lasted for" three hours."

What's a good alternative to "has lasted for"?

Alternatives include "has continued for", "has persisted for", or "has extended for". The best choice depends on the specific context and nuance you want to convey.

Is it correct to say "lasted for" instead of "has lasted for"?

Using "lasted for" implies the duration is completely in the past. "Has lasted for" indicates the duration continues to the present. For example, "The event lasted for a week (in the past)," versus "The event "has lasted for" a week (and is still ongoing)."

Can "has lasted for" be used with any time frame?

Yes, "has lasted for" can be used with various time frames, from short periods like "minutes" or "hours" to longer periods like "years", "decades", or even "centuries".