has contributed

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "has contributed" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that someone or something has played a part in bringing about a result or effect, often in a positive context. Example: "Her research has contributed significantly to our understanding of climate change."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

But Posada has contributed.

The New York Times - Sports

Berlusconi has contributed enough already.

The New York Times

"Everybody has contributed," Hunsicker said.

The New York Times - Sports

Even Peter Munro has contributed.

The New York Times - Sports

He has contributed his life".

The Guardian

Most of the above has contributed.

The New York Times - Sports

Banking has contributed immensely to modern civilization.

The New York Times

Press Agency has contributed to this report.

Independent

Greece has contributed mightily to its problems.

The New York Times

The state has contributed to the imbalance.

The Economist

BRITAIN has contributed much to sport.

The Economist

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "has contributed" to clearly indicate the positive impact or role someone or something has had in a particular situation or outcome. Ensure the context provides enough information about what was contributed and the result.

Common error

While grammatically correct, excessive use of "has contributed" in passive voice (e.g., "It has been contributed by...") can make your writing sound less direct and less engaging. Opt for active voice where possible to improve clarity and impact.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "has contributed" functions as a verb phrase in the present perfect tense. It typically connects a subject with its positive influence or role in bringing about a result. As Ludwig AI indicates, it is grammatically sound and widely accepted.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

40%

Science

30%

Formal & Business

15%

Less common in

Academia

5%

Encyclopedias

5%

Wiki

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "has contributed" is a grammatically correct and frequently used verb phrase that indicates a positive impact or role. Ludwig AI confirms its validity and usability in written English. It is common across various contexts, particularly in News & Media, Science, and Formal & Business domains. Alternatives such as "played a role" or "made a contribution" can be used for variety, but "has contributed" remains a clear and effective choice for emphasizing positive influence. Be mindful of overuse in passive constructions and ensure the context clarifies the nature and result of the contribution.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

made a contribution

Highlights the act of giving or adding something of value.

added to

Highlights the act of increasing or supplementing something.

played a role

Emphasizes the part someone or something took in an event or situation.

helped bring about

Emphasizes the role in causing or creating something.

was instrumental in

Stresses the importance of someone or something in achieving a particular outcome.

factored into

Implies something was a component that influenced an outcome.

aided in

Focuses on the assistance provided.

assisted with

Similar to 'aided in', but can imply a more supportive role.

lent itself to

Suggests something indirectly helped a situation.

had a hand in

Indicates involvement, often in a collaborative effort.

FAQs

How can I use "has contributed" in a sentence?

Use "has contributed" to show that someone or something played a part in achieving a result or effect. For example, "Her research "has contributed" significantly to our understanding of climate change".

What are some alternatives to "has contributed"?

You can use alternatives like "played a role", "made a contribution", or "was instrumental in" depending on the context.

Is it better to use "has contributed to" or "contributed to"?

"Has contributed to" implies a more recent or ongoing contribution, while "contributed to" may refer to a contribution in the past. The best choice depends on the specific context and the timeframe you wish to emphasize.

What's the difference between "has contributed" and "helped"?

"Has contributed" suggests a more significant or formal role in achieving something, while "helped" is a more general term for assistance. Use "has contributed" when you want to emphasize the impact or importance of the contribution, or when the context is formal.