has conducted with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "has conducted with" is not correct in standard written English.
It is typically used incorrectly as "conduct" does not require "with" when referring to carrying out an action or activity. Example: "The researcher has conducted a study on climate change."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Academia

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

22 human-written examples

Dante Anzolini has conducted with great success in Europe, North and South America.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The show is informed by a series of interviews that Mr. Elice has conducted with Cher.

The New York Times

But interviews my research team has conducted with educators and parents show that Americans maintain broad and complex aims for education.

The Washington Post

Recent research ICEDR has conducted with CEOs, HR executives, and enterprise leaders echo those conversations and sheds some light on the reasons for the shortage.

Harvard Business Review

But a theme emerges in interviews the Guardian has conducted with more than half a dozen drone survivors: the pain from the strike never ends, as the apparatus of secrecy renders closure unobtainable.

The Guardian

The crew had told the mechanics that they had a "runaway stabilizer," and told air traffic controllers that they had a "stabilizer jam," according to interviews that the safety board has conducted with people on the ground.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

38 human-written examples

That same week, an interview I had conducted with Andrea was published in the Guardian.

The Guardian - Opinion

He added, "We don't normally respond or comment on any sort of leads we've conducted with the Joint Terrorism Task Force".

The New York Times - Arts

A 1971 issue of Gay featured an interview that Leitsch had conducted with a twenty-five-year-old Bette Midler.

The New Yorker

He said the spending review had been the smoothest of the three he had conducted, with nothing imposed on ministers and no deep disputes within government.

The Guardian

Afterwards Chancellor Gordon Brown, who worked in TV news before entering politics, described it as the most effective and challenging interview any national broadcaster had conducted with Thatcher.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using "with" after "has conducted". Instead, directly state what was conducted, like "The researcher has conducted a study".

Common error

Do not add the preposition "with" after "has conducted" when the intention is to describe the action of carrying out an activity. The correct form omits "with". For example, say "The team has conducted experiments" not "The team has conducted with experiments".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "has conducted with" is generally considered grammatically incorrect. The auxiliary verb "has" indicates the present perfect tense, while "conducted" refers to performing an activity. The unnecessary addition of "with" disrupts the standard grammatical structure. As indicated by Ludwig AI, this phrasing is not correct in standard English.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

52%

Academia

20%

Science

12%

Less common in

Formal & Business

8%

Wiki

4%

Reference

4%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "has conducted with" appears in various contexts, including news, academia, and science, it is grammatically incorrect. Ludwig AI confirms that the preposition "with" is unnecessary and disrupts the sentence's structure. It's best to use "has conducted" followed directly by the object of the action to maintain grammatical correctness. Consider alternatives like "has carried out", "has performed", or "has undertaken" depending on the specific context. By avoiding the unnecessary "with", you'll ensure clarity and accuracy in your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

has carried out with

Replaces "conducted" with "carried out", offering a synonymous but more common phrasing. It still retains the problematic preposition 'with'.

has performed with

Substitutes "conducted" with "performed", suitable when referring to experiments, tasks or duties but does not solve the main issue.

has undertaken with

Replaces "conducted" with "undertaken", slightly more formal but synonymous, still has same problem.

has engaged in with

Uses "engaged in" instead of "conducted", emphasizing involvement. It still retains the problematic preposition 'with'.

has participated with

Replaces "conducted" with "participated", highlighting collaborative action. It still retains the problematic preposition 'with'.

has executed with

Replaces "conducted" with "executed", suitable for formal or technical contexts. It still retains the problematic preposition 'with'.

has completed with

Uses "completed" instead of "conducted", emphasizing the fulfillment of a task. It still retains the problematic preposition 'with'.

has handled with

Replaces "conducted" with "handled", indicating management or control. It still retains the problematic preposition 'with'.

has organized with

Uses "organized" instead of "conducted", focusing on structured arrangement but it still retains the problematic preposition 'with'.

has supervised with

Replaces "conducted" with "supervised", referring to overseeing an activity, and it still retains the problematic preposition 'with'.

FAQs

How to properly use "has conducted" in a sentence?

Use "has conducted" followed directly by the object of the action, without adding "with". For example: "The company has conducted a thorough review" is correct. Avoid saying "The company has conducted with a thorough review".

What are some alternatives to "has conducted with"?

Better alternatives include phrases like "has carried out", "has performed", or "has undertaken", depending on the context. These options avoid the grammatically incorrect use of "with".

Is it correct to say "has conducted with"?

No, it is generally considered grammatically incorrect to say "has conducted with". The verb "conduct" doesn't require the preposition "with" when describing an action. You should use "has conducted" followed directly by the object.

What is the difference between "has conducted" and "has conducted with"?

"Has conducted" is the correct and standard way to express that someone has carried out an action or activity. "Has conducted with" is redundant and grammatically incorrect; the "with" is unnecessary.