has completely changed

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "has completely changed" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to describe a situation or condition that has undergone a total transformation or alteration. Example: "Since the new management took over, the company's culture has completely changed for the better."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

58 human-written examples

That has completely changed.

The Economist

"Now it has completely changed.

The New York Times

That has completely changed now".

The New York Times

"The situation has completely changed," he explained.

The New Yorker

It has completely changed my life".

Independent

"This industry has completely changed," he said.

The New York Times

His wife, too, has completely changed.

Independent

The national mood has completely changed.

The Guardian

"The mind-set has completely changed".

The New York Times

"But the landscape has completely changed.

The New York Times

Basically, it has completely changed the game.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "has completely changed", consider if the change is positive, negative, or neutral. This adds depth to your writing and provides a clearer picture for the reader.

Common error

While "has completely changed" is valid, overuse can weaken its impact. Vary your language with synonyms like "fundamentally altered" or "dramatically reshaped" to keep your writing engaging.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "has completely changed" functions as a verb phrase in the present perfect tense. It asserts that a subject has undergone a total transformation. Ludwig confirms this is a correct usage.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

100%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Science

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "has completely changed" is a versatile and commonly used expression to indicate that something has undergone a thorough transformation. As Ludwig AI confirms, its grammatical structure is correct, and its usage spans across diverse fields, although it is most frequently found in News & Media. When using "has completely changed", it's helpful to provide context on the nature and extent of the alteration to ensure clarity. Alternatives like "has totally transformed" or "has fundamentally altered" offer slight variations in emphasis.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

has totally transformed

Emphasizes a thorough and dramatic change, often implying a change in form or appearance.

has fundamentally altered

Indicates a change that affects the essential nature or structure of something.

has dramatically reshaped

Suggests a significant change that has redefined the form or character of something.

has revolutionized

Implies a complete and fundamental change, often associated with significant advancements or breakthroughs.

has undergone a metamorphosis

Evokes a profound and complete transformation, often associated with nature or personal growth.

is unrecognisable

Highlights the extent of the transformation to the point that the original state is no longer discernible.

bears no resemblance to

Stresses the complete lack of similarity between the current state and the previous state.

is a world apart from

Indicates a significant difference or separation from a previous condition or state.

is night and day compared to

Emphasizes a stark contrast between the present and the past.

has turned upside down

Indicates a significant upheaval or reversal of a situation.

FAQs

How can I use "has completely changed" in a sentence?

Use "has completely changed" to describe something that is now entirely different from what it was before. For example, "The internet "has completely changed" the way we communicate".

What are some alternatives to "has completely changed"?

You can use alternatives such as "has totally transformed", "has fundamentally altered", or "has dramatically reshaped" depending on the specific context.

Is it redundant to say "has completely changed"?

While "completely changed" is emphatic, it's not necessarily redundant if you want to stress the totality of the transformation. However, ensure the context warrants such a strong statement.

How does "has completely changed" differ from "has changed"?

"Has changed" indicates that some alteration has occurred. "Has completely changed" implies that the alteration is total and thorough, leaving the subject fundamentally different.