has been splitted

USAGE SUMMARY

'has been splitted' is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to refer to something that has been divided into two or more parts. For example, "The group has been splitted up into three teams for the project."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

Figure 2 has been splitted in separate figures.

Biology Direct

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

57 human-written examples

After the bootstrap data has been split at the top node, the splitting process is repeated.

Briefings in Bioinformatics

The deal has been split.

The Economist

So it has been split into two.

The New York Times

Q: The UK Borders Agency has been split up.

The Guardian

The presentation has been split in two.

The New York Times - Arts

The finance ministry has been split in two.

The Economist

More recently, the profession has been split over its merits.

The Economist

In the past, it has been split by fratricidal disputes.

The Economist

For decades, the G.O.P. has been split into two camps.

The New Yorker

"The county has been split in two," Mr. Telles lamented.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Consider using "has been divided" or "has been split" as more common and widely accepted alternatives to "has been splitted" in formal writing.

Common error

Avoid using "splitted" excessively in your writing. While grammatically valid, it can sound less polished than "split" or "divided". Opt for these alternatives to improve clarity and flow.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "has been splitted" functions as a passive voice construction indicating that something has undergone a process of division. As noted by Ludwig, it's grammatically correct, although less common than similar alternatives. One example is from Biology Direct.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

50%

News & Media

50%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "has been splitted" is grammatically correct, but as verified by Ludwig AI, it is significantly less common than alternatives like "has been split" or "has been divided". Its primary function is to describe a completed action of division, with usage contexts spanning science and news media. For formal writing, opting for the more conventional alternatives is advisable to ensure clarity and impact. While "has been splitted" is understandable, its infrequent usage may make your writing sound slightly less polished.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

has been divided

Replaces "splitted" with the more common synonym "divided".

has been separated

Substitutes "splitted" with "separated", emphasizing a more distinct division.

has been partitioned

Uses "partitioned" instead of "splitted", suggesting a more formal or structured division.

has been broken down

Replaces "splitted" with "broken down", implying a more detailed or fragmented division.

has been fragmented

Uses "fragmented" instead of "splitted", suggesting a division into smaller, disconnected pieces.

has been cleaved

Employs "cleaved" to replace "splitted", suitable for scientific or technical contexts emphasizing a precise split.

has been bisected

Replaces "splitted" with "bisected", specifically indicating a division into two equal parts.

has undergone division

Transforms the phrase into a more formal structure using "undergone division".

has been bifurcated

Uses "bifurcated" in place of "splitted", highlighting a division into two branches or directions.

has been disjointed

Replaces "splitted" with "disjointed", suggesting a division that results in disconnected elements.

FAQs

Is "has been splitted" grammatically correct?

Yes, "has been splitted" is grammatically correct, but it's less common than "has been split" or "has been divided".

What's a more common alternative to "has been splitted"?

A more common alternative is "has been split". It is more widely used and generally preferred in formal writing.

When should I use "has been splitted"?

"Has been splitted" can be used, but it's best reserved for contexts where you want to emphasize the act of separating something into multiple pieces and where informality is acceptable. However, "has been divided" is a more appropriate alternative in most cases.

What is the difference between "has been splitted" and "has been split"?

While both are grammatically valid, "has been split" is the past participle of "split" and is far more commonly used and accepted. "Has been splitted" uses a less frequent and slightly awkward form of the verb.