has been split

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "has been split" is a correct and usable part of a sentence in written English.
You can use it when referring to something that has been divided into smaller parts. For example: "The team has been split into smaller groups, each responsible for different tasks."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

After the bootstrap data has been split at the top node, the splitting process is repeated.

Briefings in Bioinformatics

The deal has been split.

The Economist

So it has been split into two.

The New York Times

The presentation has been split in two.

The New York Times - Arts

More recently, the profession has been split over its merits.

The Economist

Igraa's own family has been split by the Islamist trend.

The New York Times

The finance ministry has been split in two.

The Economist

In the past, it has been split by fratricidal disputes.

The Economist

For decades, the G.O.P. has been split into two camps.

The New Yorker

"The county has been split in two," Mr. Telles lamented.

The New York Times

"The opposition has been split and society polarised.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "has been split" when you want to emphasize that something has undergone a process of division, often implying a before-and-after state. For instance: "The workload has been split to improve efficiency."

Common error

Avoid using "has been split" when you mean "is splitting" or "will be split". "Has been split" indicates a completed action, not an ongoing or future one. For example, instead of saying "The task has been split tomorrow", say "The task will be split tomorrow."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "has been split" functions as a verb phrase in the present perfect passive voice. It describes a completed action where something was divided or separated, and its effects are still relevant. As seen in Ludwig, it's grammatically sound.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

44%

Science

24%

Academia

14%

Less common in

Wiki

8%

Formal & Business

6%

Reference

4%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "has been split" is a versatile and grammatically sound phrase used to indicate that something has been divided or separated. As Ludwig AI confirms, it adheres to standard English grammar. Its frequency across various sources, especially in news, science, and academic contexts, underscores its widespread use. To ensure clarity, remember that "has been split" describes a completed action with ongoing relevance, and it's crucial to select the correct tense to avoid confusion. By understanding the nuances of "has been split", writers can effectively communicate division or separation within their writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

has been divided

Replaces "split" with "divided", emphasizing separation into parts.

has been separated

Focuses on the act of setting apart or disconnecting.

has been partitioned

Implies a more formal or structured division.

has been allocated

Emphasizes distribution or assignment to different recipients or purposes.

has been apportioned

Suggests a fair or proportional distribution.

has been cleaved

Implies a sharp or forceful division.

has been खंडित

Highlights a disuniting or fragmenting effect.

has been bifurcated

Specifically indicates division into two branches or parts.

has been dissected

Conveys a detailed and analytical separation.

has been fragmented

Suggests breaking into many small, disconnected pieces.

FAQs

How can I use "has been split" in a sentence?

Use "has been split" to describe something that has already been divided into parts. For instance, "The project "has been split" into phases to better manage the workflow."

What are some alternatives to "has been split"?

You can use alternatives like "has been divided", "has been separated", or "has been partitioned" depending on the specific context.

Is it correct to say "has been split up" instead of "has been split"?

Both "has been split" and "has been split up" are grammatically correct, but ""has been split"" is often more concise and suitable for formal writing. "Has been split up" can imply a more thorough or forceful division.

What's the difference between "has been split" and "was split"?

"Has been split" indicates a present perfect tense, emphasizing the result of a past action that continues to be relevant now. "Was split" is past simple, merely stating that something was divided at some point in the past without necessarily implying ongoing relevance. For example, "The company was split in 2000" versus "The company "has been split" into divisions, each focusing on a different product line".