has been reviewed

USAGE SUMMARY

"has been reviewed" is correct and usable in written English.
This phrase is most often used in formal contexts to indicate that something has been assessed or looked over. For example, "The candidate's background has been reviewed and they have been accepted into the program."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Once your story has been reviewed, it will appear online.

The Guardian

He said, "The test has been reviewed many, many times.

The New York Times

15. (U) This message has been reviewed by Admiral Fallon.

The Guardian

It has been reviewed by Informed Edinburgh and Edinburgh Spotlight.

The Guardian

The literature on his person and texts has been reviewed.

Actas Urológicas Españolas

Recent computational work in this area has been reviewed.

Process Systems Engineering

Almost every area of the health system has been reviewed rigorously.

The Guardian

"Our accounting has been reviewed and found to be sound," Mr. Kozlowski said.

The New York Times

We've seen senior director changes and the communications function has been reviewed twice.

The Guardian

"Every aspect has been reviewed by G.E.'s board, and it will be a flawless handoff".

The New York Times

The Graham case has been reviewed by state and federal courts for 16 years.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "has been reviewed" when you want to indicate that something has undergone a formal or systematic evaluation. This implies a careful assessment.

Common error

Avoid overusing passive voice constructions like "has been reviewed" when active voice would be more direct and engaging. For example, instead of "The report has been reviewed by the team", consider "The team reviewed the report."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "has been reviewed" functions as a passive construction indicating that a subject has undergone a process of examination and assessment. Ludwig AI indicates that the phrase is grammatically correct and usable in written English. Examples from Ludwig show it used across various contexts, highlighting its versatility.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

49%

News & Media

35%

Academia

13%

Less common in

Formal & Business

1%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "has been reviewed" is a versatile and grammatically sound phrase used to indicate that something has undergone examination and assessment. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is appropriate for various contexts, with a leaning towards formal and neutral registers. Its prevalence in science, news, and academic sources underscores its value in communicating thorough evaluation. Remember to consider active voice alternatives for more direct writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

has been examined

Uses a different verb to express a similar action of looking into something.

has been assessed

Emphasizes the evaluation aspect of the review process.

has been inspected

Suggests a more detailed and thorough examination.

has been evaluated

Focuses on judging the quality or value of something.

has undergone review

Rephrases the sentence to emphasize the process of review.

was subject to review

Highlights that the item was under a formal review process.

has been checked

Indicates a verification process to ensure correctness or quality.

has been audited

Implies a systematic and independent examination of records.

has been scrutinized

Conveys a critical and thorough examination, often for flaws.

has been considered

Suggests that something has been thought about and taken into account.

FAQs

How is "has been reviewed" used in a sentence?

"Has been reviewed" indicates that a subject has undergone examination and assessment. For example, "The manuscript "has been reviewed" by experts in the field."

What are some alternatives to "has been reviewed"?

Alternatives include "has been examined", "has been assessed", or "has undergone review", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it better to say "has been reviewed" or "was reviewed"?

Both "has been reviewed" and "was reviewed" are grammatically correct, but they have slightly different implications. "Has been reviewed" implies the review process is completed and has relevance to the present, while "was reviewed" simply indicates a past action.

What is the difference between "has been reviewed" and "is under review"?

"Has been reviewed" indicates that the review process is complete, while "is under review" means that the review process is currently in progress. The former signifies completion, the latter signifies an ongoing process.