has been rejected

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase 'has been rejected' is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when describing a decision that has been made regarding a proposal or application. For example, "The zoning committee has rejected the proposal for a new apartment complex in the city center."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

But it has been rejected".

The New York Times

"Terrorism has been rejected.

The Guardian

It has been rejected by both sides.

The Economist

Our national credit card has been rejected.

The New York Times

The allegation has been rejected as absurd.

The Guardian

Three times he has been rejected.

The Guardian

Automatic offshore information-sharing has been rejected.

The Guardian

He has been rejected six times.

The New York Times

They contain everything that has been rejected for publication.

The New Yorker

To some extent, the party has been rejected.

Independent

This has been rejected by the Cambodian government.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "has been rejected", ensure the context clearly indicates what was rejected and the reason for rejection, if known. Clarity is key for effective communication.

Common error

Avoid using "has been rejected" when "has been modified" or "is under review" is more accurate. Overusing the term can create a negative impression when a more collaborative approach is being taken.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "has been rejected" primarily functions as a verb phrase in the passive voice. It indicates that a subject (proposal, idea, application) has undergone the action of being turned down. As confirmed by Ludwig, the phrase is grammatically correct and widely used.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

68%

Science

18%

Formal & Business

14%

Less common in

Wiki

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "has been rejected" is a grammatically sound and frequently used verb phrase indicating that something has been turned down. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is suitable for various contexts, although it appears most often in news and media. When writing, consider the audience and context to decide whether a more direct phrase like "has been rejected" is preferable or if a softer alternative, such as "was not accepted", might be more appropriate. Clarity and sensitivity are crucial when delivering news of a rejection.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

has been refused

Uses a synonym for "rejected", maintaining the same meaning of being turned down.

has been denied

Emphasizes the withholding of something that was requested, similar to being rejected.

was turned down

Rephrases using a phrasal verb to indicate rejection.

was declined

A more formal synonym for "rejected", suitable for professional contexts.

was dismissed

Implies that something was considered but ultimately not accepted or deemed worthy.

did not pass

Indicates a failure to meet the required criteria for acceptance.

has not been approved

Focuses on the lack of positive endorsement, rather than outright rejection.

has been discarded

Suggests something was rejected and also deemed unimportant or useless.

was thrown out

Informal way to describe something that was rejected.

was not accepted

A more neutral expression indicating a lack of approval or agreement.

FAQs

How can I use "has been rejected" in a sentence?

The phrase "has been rejected" is used to indicate that a proposal, idea, or application has been turned down. For example, "The funding proposal "has been rejected" by the board."

What are some alternatives to "has been rejected"?

Alternatives include phrases like "has been refused", "was turned down", or "was declined", depending on the context and desired level of formality.

Is it better to say "has been rejected" or "was not accepted"?

Both "has been rejected" and "was not accepted" are correct, but "has been rejected" can sound more definitive and potentially negative. "Was not accepted" may be a gentler way to convey the same information.

Can "has been rejected" be used in both formal and informal contexts?

While generally suitable for both formal and informal contexts, it is important to consider the audience and the specific situation. In very sensitive situations, using softer language might be preferable.