has been identify

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "has been identify" is not correct in English.
Did you mean "has been identified"? You can use "has been identified" when referring to something that has been recognized or determined in the past and continues to be relevant. Example: "The source of the problem has been identified as a software glitch."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

The rs1884725 polymorphism has been identify as a genetic variant associated with disease risk and outcomes in multiple myeloma [ 36].

BMC Cancer

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

No treatment has been identified.

The New York Times

Neither woman has been identified.

The New York Times

The finger has been identified.

The New York Times - Arts

The man has been identified as Haruna Yakawa.

Independent

No suspects or motive has been identified.

The New York Times

A suspect has been identified.

The New York Times

Your loved one has been identified.

The New York Times

Her problem has been identifying "her day".

The Guardian - Sport

Neither of the suspects has been identified.

The Guardian

The victim has been identified as Andrew Coffey.

The Washington Post

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Always use the correct past participle form of the verb "identify", which is "identified", after "has been". This ensures grammatical accuracy and clarity.

Common error

Avoid using the base form "identify" after "has been". The correct structure is "has been identified". For example, instead of "the problem has been identify", say "the problem "has been identified"".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "has been identify" attempts to function as part of a passive perfect construction, but the verb form is incorrect. Ludwig AI points out that the correct form is "has been identified". Thus, the primary grammatical issue is incorrect verb conjugation.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

33%

News & Media

33%

Formal & Business

33%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "has been identify" is grammatically incorrect. As Ludwig AI indicates, the correct form is "has been identified". This correction is crucial for maintaining grammatical accuracy across all writing contexts. The intended purpose is to express that something has been recognized or determined, but the incorrect conjugation hinders effective communication. Remember to use "identified", the past participle of "identify", after "has been" to ensure your writing is clear and correct.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

has been identified

Corrects the grammatical error by using the past participle form of the verb.

was identified

Changes the tense and voice to passive past tense, implying a completed action of identification.

is identified

Shifts to present tense, suggesting an ongoing or current identification.

can be identified

Expresses the possibility of identification.

has been found

Uses a synonym for "identified", focusing on the discovery aspect.

was determined

Replaces "identified" with "determined", indicating a more conclusive finding.

has been recognized

Emphasizes the recognition of something rather than just its identification.

is known as

Uses a completely different structure to convey that something has a recognized name or identity.

is classified as

Indicates that something has been placed into a specific category.

has a designation of

Indicates a formal or official identification.

FAQs

Is "has been identify" grammatically correct?

No, "has been identify" is grammatically incorrect. The correct form is ""has been identified"", using the past participle of the verb.

What's the difference between "has been identify" and "has been identified"?

"Has been identify" is grammatically incorrect due to the incorrect verb form. "Has been identified" is the correct passive perfect form, indicating that something has been recognized or determined.

How can I use "has been identified" in a sentence?

You can use ""has been identified"" to indicate that something has been recognized or determined. For example, "The cause of the error "has been identified" as a software bug."

What are some alternatives to "has been identified"?

Depending on the context, you can use phrases like "was identified", "is identified", or "has been found" as alternatives.