Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

has been expected for

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "has been expected for" is correct and usable in written English.
This phrase is typically used to express that something has been anticipated or anticipated for a certain period of time. For example, "The arrival of the new shipment of parts has been expected for weeks."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

53 human-written examples

The deal has been expected for months.

News & Media

The New York Times

The move has been expected for months.

The repeal has been expected for months.

News & Media

The New York Times

"This disruption has been expected for years now.

The move has been expected for some time.

News & Media

The New York Times

This has been expected for a couple of months.

Show more...

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

7 human-written examples

This is the day that Scotland has been expecting for two years.

News & Media

Vice

It had been expected for months.

News & Media

Independent

The deal had been expected for weeks.

News & Media

The New York Times

The release had been expected for several weeks.

News & Media

The New York Times

The move had been expected for quite some time.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use the phrase "has been expected for" to convey that an event or outcome has been anticipated for a certain duration, building expectation or mitigating surprise. It is best used when the expectation is based on logical reasoning, previous announcements, or visible trends.

Common error

While "has been expected for" is a valid passive construction, excessive use of passive voice can make your writing sound weak. If possible, reframe the sentence to highlight the actors involved, making it more direct and engaging.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

86%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "has been expected for" functions as a passive construction, indicating that an event or outcome has been anticipated for a certain period. Ludwig AI confirms its usability in diverse contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

88%

Science

8%

Formal & Business

2%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "has been expected for" is a grammatically sound and frequently used construction in the English language, particularly within news and media contexts. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, it effectively conveys the idea that something has been anticipated over a period of time. While interchangeable alternatives like "was anticipated" or "was foreseen" exist, "has been expected for" specifically emphasizes the duration of the anticipation. When employing this phrase, be mindful of potential overuse of passive voice and ensure the context aligns with the intended communicative purpose of expressing a lack of surprise due to prior expectation.

FAQs

How do I use "has been expected for" in a sentence?

You can use "has been expected for" to indicate that something has been anticipated for a specific duration. For example, "The announcement "has been expected for" weeks."

What can I say instead of "has been expected for"?

You can use alternatives like "was anticipated", "was foreseen", or "was predicted" depending on the specific context.

Is "has been expected for" grammatically correct?

Yes, "has been expected for" is grammatically correct. It uses the present perfect passive voice, which is appropriate when describing an expectation that began in the past and continues to the present.

What's the difference between "has been expected for" and "was expected"?

"Has been expected for" implies an expectation that has persisted over a period, while "was expected" simply states that something was anticipated at a particular point in the past. The former emphasizes the duration of the anticipation.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

86%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: