has been charged

USAGE SUMMARY

"has been charged" is correct and can be used in written English.
You can use it when one is facing a consequence due to actions they took or others. Example sentence: After much deliberation, the suspect has been charged with three counts of fraud.

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

Neither lawmaker has been charged.

The New York Times

No one has been charged.

The New York Times - Sports

Neither has been charged with any crimes.

The New York Times

He has been charged with culpable homicide.

Independent

Specialist Morlock has been charged with murder.

The New York Times

None has been charged with espionage.

The New York Times

Mr. Ng has been charged with embezzlement.

The New York Times

Mr. Johnson has been charged with assault.

The New York Times

He has been charged with murder.

The New York Times

His wife has been charged with perjury.

The New York Times

No one has been charged or disciplined.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "has been charged", ensure you specify the crime or offense for clarity. For example, "He has been charged with fraud."

Common error

Avoid using "has been charged" without stating the specific charge. This can lead to ambiguity and potential misinterpretation. Always specify the offense, such as "has been charged with theft" rather than just "has been charged".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "has been charged" functions as a passive voice construction of the verb 'charge', indicating that someone is the recipient of the action. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is used to denote that a formal accusation of a crime has been made against an individual. The examples in Ludwig illustrate this usage across various news and media contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

100%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Science

0%

Academia

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "has been charged" is a common and grammatically correct way to indicate that someone has been formally accused of a crime. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's predominantly found in news and media contexts, serving to inform the public about legal proceedings. When using this phrase, it's best practice to specify the exact charges to avoid ambiguity. While alternatives like "has been accused of" exist, "has been charged" specifically denotes a formal legal accusation. Remember to specify the offense the person is accused of, as writing guidance pointed out, and always be clear. Due to its frequent use in legal and news contexts, the register is neutral, ensuring wide understanding.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

has been formally accused of

Highlights the official nature of the accusation.

has been accused of

Focuses on the accusation rather than the formal charging process.

is facing charges of

Highlights the ongoing nature of the legal process.

has been indicted for

Specifically refers to a formal indictment by a grand jury.

is under investigation for

Indicates an ongoing investigation that may lead to charges.

is suspected of

Implies a lower level of certainty than "has been charged".

is being held on suspicion of

Indicates that someone is detained but not yet formally charged.

has been apprehended for

Emphasizes the act of capture related to the alleged crime.

is being prosecuted for

Highlights the act of bringing someone to trial.

is alleged to have

Focuses on the alleged actions leading to potential charges.

FAQs

How to use "has been charged" in a sentence?

Use "has been charged" to indicate that someone has been formally accused of a crime. For instance, "The suspect "has been charged" with robbery."

What can I say instead of "has been charged"?

You can use alternatives like "has been accused of", "is facing charges of", or "has been indicted for" depending on the context.

Which is correct, "has been charged" or "was accused"?

"Has been charged" implies a formal accusation by legal authorities, whereas "was accused" suggests a general claim or allegation, not necessarily formalized in court.

What's the difference between "has been charged" and "is suspected of"?

"Has been charged" indicates a formal accusation, whereas "is suspected of" implies that authorities believe someone may have committed a crime but hasn't been formally accused yet.