has argued with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "has argued with" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe a situation where someone has engaged in a disagreement or dispute with another person. Example: "She has argued with her colleagues about the best approach to the project."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

22 human-written examples

He has argued, with some justification, that Mr Cardoso failed to mobilise popular support for his policies.

The Economist

He has argued with me, agreed with me and everything in between, although more arguing than agreeing.

The New York Times

Yet, since 2005, he has argued, with commendable determination, in favour of constraints that would protect urban gardens from being developed.

Independent

The government, in turn, has argued with Spain and Britain that their courts lack jurisdiction in the Pinochet case, and that the general should be returned to Chile.

The Economist

Aguado's mother comes from Puerto Rico, and he has argued with Hispanic friends who thought that John's statues were a "slur on the community".

The New Yorker

He has argued with Europe over many issues, including trade, the role of Russia's gas monopoly, and recognition of an independent Kosovo.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

38 human-written examples

I shouldn't have argued with her.

The New York Times

I have argued with Jewish readers over this.

Independent

In his testimony, Mr. Coicou denied having argued with Mr. Bell.

The New York Times

He said: 'How could we have argued with total freedom?

The New York Times - Sports

"If he had won, I couldn't have argued with it".

The New York Times - Sports

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "has argued with", ensure the context clearly indicates the subject and object of the argument to avoid ambiguity. For example, specify who "has argued with" whom and about what.

Common error

Avoid using "has argued with" without specifying who the argument was with. Vague references can confuse the reader and weaken the impact of your statement.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "has argued with" functions as a verb phrase indicating a past action of disagreement or conflict. It signifies that someone has engaged in an argument with another party. As Ludwig AI confirms, this is correct and usable in written English.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

88%

Wiki

4%

Formal & Business

4%

Less common in

Science

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "has argued with" is a commonly used phrase indicating a past disagreement or conflict. It is deemed grammatically correct by Ludwig AI and is primarily found in news and media contexts. When employing this phrase, ensure the context clearly identifies the parties involved to avoid ambiguity. While the phrase is generally neutral, be mindful of the intensity implied by the context. Consider alternatives such as "disagreed with" or "debated with" depending on the formality and nature of the disagreement. The sources analyzed, including The New York Times and The Guardian, confirm its widespread use in reporting conflicts and disputes.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

disagreed with

Focuses on a difference of opinion without necessarily implying a heated exchange.

quarreled with

Implies a more heated and emotional disagreement than "has argued with".

clashed with

Suggests a strong conflict, potentially with significant consequences.

contended with

Formal and emphasizes persistent disagreement or competition.

disputed with

Focuses on questioning the validity or truth of something.

sparred with

Suggests a less serious, more playful form of argument or debate.

wrangled with

Implies a complex and often frustrating argument or negotiation.

been at odds with

Highlights a state of disagreement or incompatibility over time.

locked horns with

An idiomatic phrase emphasizing a direct and forceful confrontation.

debated with

Highlights a formal discussion of opposing arguments.

FAQs

What is the difference between "has argued with" and "has debated with"?

"Has argued with" implies a disagreement, potentially heated, while "has debated with" suggests a more formal and structured discussion.

What are some alternatives to "has argued with" that imply a less confrontational disagreement?

Alternatives include "disagreed with" or "differed with", which focus on differences of opinion without the implication of conflict.

Is it correct to use "has argued with" to describe a formal debate?

While grammatically correct, "has argued with" is better suited for informal disagreements. "Has debated with" or "has discussed with" are more appropriate for formal contexts.

How do I use "has argued with" in a sentence?

Ensure you include both parties involved in the argument. For example: "He has argued with his manager about the new policy" or "The government has argued with the opposition over the budget."