has already lost

USAGE SUMMARY

"has already lost" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
You could use this phrase when referring to something that has been lost and cannot be recovered. For example, "She has already lost the opportunity to attend the event."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

58 human-written examples

It has already lost them.

The Economist

Italy has already lost ground.

The Guardian - Sport

Mr. Levy has already lost one skirmish.

The New York Times

One apartment has already lost them.

The New York Times

(He has already lost four of them).

The New York Times

This city has already lost a lot, after all.

The New York Times

He has already lost his soul... How dare you #walterpalmer !!!!

Independent

"Our family has already lost someone in this accident.

The New York Times

But this elegant village has already lost several historic buildings.

The New York Times

He has already lost his father and mother.

The Guardian - Books

Trump has already lost substantial support among the GOP.

The Guardian - Opinion

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "has already lost" to clearly indicate that something was lost at a specific point in the past and the consequences are still relevant now. This emphasizes the lasting impact of the loss.

Common error

Avoid using "has already lost" in hypothetical scenarios. The phrase implies a definite past event, so stick to constructions like "would lose" or "could lose" when discussing possibilities rather than certainties.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "has already lost" functions as a past participle construction indicating a completed action with present relevance. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase is correct and widely used, emphasizing a past event's ongoing impact. For example, "The company has already lost market share."

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

100%

Less common in

Science

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Academia

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "has already lost" is a versatile and common expression used to indicate a past loss with present-day relevance. As Ludwig AI confirms, its grammatical correctness and frequent usage, particularly in news and media contexts, make it a reliable choice for clearly conveying that something was lost at a specific point in the past, and that the consequences are still being felt. While appropriate for neutral contexts, it's important to avoid its use in hypothetical scenarios, where alternative constructions like "would lose" or "could lose" would be more suitable.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

already suffered a loss

Rephrases the loss as something that has been suffered, emphasizing the experience of the loss.

incurred a loss already

Emphasizes the action of incurring a loss, often in a financial or quantifiable sense.

previously experienced defeat

Uses more formal language to indicate a prior failure or loss in a competitive context.

already conceded defeat

Highlights the act of acknowledging a loss or failure before the final outcome.

lost ground in the past

Focuses on the concept of losing progress or advantage at an earlier time.

missed the chance previously

Emphasizes the loss of an opportunity that was available in the past.

has forfeited previously

Indicates a loss due to a rule violation or voluntary surrender.

is already behind

Suggests a current state of being at a disadvantage due to previous setbacks.

relinquished control earlier

Focuses on the giving up of power or authority at a prior time.

failed in the past

Simply states a previous failure without specifying what was lost.

FAQs

How can I use "has already lost" in a sentence?

You can use "has already lost" to indicate that someone or something experienced a loss in the past and the consequences are still relevant. For example, "The team "has already lost" two key players due to injuries."

What are some alternatives to saying "has already lost"?

Depending on the context, you could use alternatives like "already suffered a loss", "previously experienced defeat", or "incurred a loss already".

Is it correct to say "had already lost" instead of "has already lost"?

Both are grammatically correct, but they indicate different time frames. "Has already lost" implies the loss is relevant to the present, while "had already lost" refers to a loss that occurred before another point in the past.

What's the difference between "has lost" and "has already lost"?

"Has lost" simply states that a loss occurred. "Has already lost" emphasizes that the loss happened before now and the effects may still be relevant.