Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
had submitted to
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "had submitted to" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that someone has yielded or agreed to something, often in a formal or legal context. Example: "After much deliberation, the committee had submitted to the new regulations imposed by the governing body."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Encyclopedias
Science
Wiki
Alternative expressions(3)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
Soon a cartoon Yefimov had submitted to Nikolai Bukharin, the editor of Pravda, was published.
News & Media
By the mid-1830s, mofthef the local rulers had submitted to the British.
Encyclopedias
Genentech declined to state what new information it had submitted to the F.D.A.
News & Media
The article insinuated that the doctor had submitted to political pressure.
News & Media
Around 100,000 people had submitted to the rule of Mohamed and of Allah.
News & Media
(She also told me that she had submitted to the baptism solely to please her mother).
News & Media
She knew that the priest had forgotten his original idols, and had submitted to an American one.
News & Media
The pair joked about including pictures of native Australian wildlife in the proposal they had submitted to senior Appleby management.
News & Media
By October 30, 1198, Innocent sent a letter to the rectors of those cities that had submitted to papal lordship.
Encyclopedias
Mr. de Guzman said he became a suspect because of a thesis proposal he had submitted to his college.
News & Media
Mrs. Anthony guided them through a review of their homework notes, which they had submitted to her by e-mail.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Consider using synonyms like "yielded to" or "presented to" for greater clarity or impact depending on the intended meaning.
Common error
Avoid using "had submitted to" when the intended meaning is simply "sent" or "provided". "Submitted to" implies a level of yielding or formal presentation that might not always be appropriate.
Source & Trust
86%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The primary grammatical function of "had submitted to" is as a verb phrase indicating a completed action of yielding, complying, or formally presenting something. Ludwig examples demonstrate its use in diverse contexts, from formal submissions to yielding to authority. This phrase functions as a past perfect tense construction.
Frequent in
News & Media
50%
Encyclopedias
15%
Science
15%
Less common in
Wiki
5%
Formal & Business
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "had submitted to" is a grammatically sound and frequently used verb phrase to indicate that someone has yielded to something, presented something formally, or complied with a requirement. Ludwig AI confirms its correct usage. The phrase finds its prevalence across news, encyclopedias, science and wiki sources. While versatile, it's important to use the phrase with precision, ensuring that the context aligns with the intended meaning of either yielding or formal submission. Consider alternatives like "had yielded to" or "had presented to" for greater accuracy in certain situations.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
had surrendered to
Implies a complete giving up or yielding to an overwhelming force or influence.
had yielded to
Highlights the act of giving way or surrendering to pressure or authority.
had complied with
Emphasizes adherence to rules, regulations, or demands.
had presented to
Focuses on the act of formally presenting something, like a document or proposal, for review or approval.
had deferred to
Implies a respectful yielding to someone else's judgment or authority.
had acquiesced to
Suggests a passive acceptance or agreement to something without protest.
had given to
Emphasizes the act of handing over or providing something to someone.
had turned over to
Emphasizes the act of transferring control or responsibility to someone else.
had succumbed to
Suggests giving in to something negative or undesirable, like temptation or illness.
had referred to
Focuses on directing attention or information to someone or something else.
FAQs
What does "had submitted to" mean?
The phrase "had submitted to" means to have yielded or agreed to something, often implying a formal or official process, or to have presented something for consideration or approval.
What can I say instead of "had submitted to"?
You can use alternatives like "had yielded to", "had presented to", or "had complied with" depending on the context.
Is it correct to say "had submitted with" instead of "had submitted to"?
No, "had submitted with" is not grammatically correct. The correct preposition to use with "submitted" in this context is "to". "Had submitted to" indicates the recipient or the thing being yielded to.
What's the difference between "had submitted to" and "had presented to"?
"Had submitted to" implies a degree of compliance or yielding, while "had presented to" simply means something was formally presented for consideration. The nuance depends on whether there was an element of obligation or acquiescence involved. For example, a document can "had presented to" a committee, but a person "had submitted to" authority.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
86%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested