had no objection

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "had no objection" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when expressing agreement or lack of opposition to a proposal or idea. Example: "After reviewing the plan, I had no objection to moving forward with the project."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

He had no objection.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

They had no objection.

The New Yorker

I had no objection to it, either.

The New Yorker

She had no objection to civil unions.

The New Yorker

The family living there had no objection.

The New York Times

Her father had no objection, so she agreed.

The New Yorker

The Framers had no objection to direct election per se.

The New Yorker

Lewis said he had no objection to Bowman's attendance.

The New York Times - Sports

Baquet insists he had no objection to the appointment itself.

The Guardian

We had no objection to the two-level pricing.

The New York Times - Arts

12.50pm GMT Nel had no objection to this.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When precision is key, "had no objection" can be strengthened with additional details specifying the scope or conditions of the agreement.

Common error

Avoid using "had no objection" when a stronger endorsement is intended. This phrase indicates acceptance but not necessarily enthusiastic support.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "had no objection" functions as a predicate, expressing agreement or a lack of opposition to something. Ludwig AI examples show it's used when an individual or group doesn't disagree with a proposal, action, or statement. It signals acceptance without necessarily implying strong support.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

68%

Wiki

7%

Encyclopedias

3%

Less common in

Science

7%

Formal & Business

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "had no objection" is a widely used and grammatically correct way to express agreement or a lack of opposition. Ludwig AI confirms this phrase is common in news, encyclopedias and wiki sources, reflecting its neutral and sometimes formal tone. When writing, consider whether simple acceptance or stronger endorsement is needed. Alternatives such as "raised no objections" or "gave their consent" can provide different nuances. Overall, "had no objection" is a versatile and reliable phrase for indicating acceptance or lack of dissent in various contexts.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

raised no objections

Highlights the act of not voicing disagreement rather than a general lack of opposition.

expressed no opposition

Focuses on the verbal or explicit communication of not being against something.

did not oppose

A more direct and concise way of saying that someone did not act against something.

gave their consent

Implies a formal agreement or permission was granted.

offered no resistance

Suggests a lack of active pushback or struggle against something.

was in agreement

Emphasizes the alignment of opinions or views.

found it acceptable

Highlights the acceptance or permissibility of something to someone.

did not disapprove

A more formal way of stating that someone did not express negative feedback.

accepted without reservation

Indicates full acceptance without any doubts or conditions.

acquiesced to the decision

Suggests a passive acceptance, often after initial reluctance.

FAQs

How can I use "had no objection" in a sentence?

You can use "had no objection" to indicate that someone agreed with a plan, proposal, or action. For example, "The committee "had no objection" to the proposed budget."

What are some alternatives to "had no objection"?

Some alternatives include "raised no objections", "expressed no opposition", or "did not oppose", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it more formal to say "had no objection" or "didn't object"?

"Had no objection" is generally considered slightly more formal than "didn't object", although both are acceptable in most contexts. The choice depends on the overall tone of your writing or speech.

What's the difference between "had no objection" and "gave their consent"?

"Had no objection" implies a lack of opposition, while "gave their consent" suggests a more active and explicit agreement or permission. Consent implies a formal agreement, while 'had no objection' can be passive.