had no data for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "had no data for" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when indicating a lack of information or evidence regarding a specific subject or query. Example: "The researchers had no data for the effects of the new drug on elderly patients."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

19 human-written examples

First, because I could not recover the entire dynamic range of the image, I had to estimate the values for which I had no data for.

Stanford University

They just filled in blanks where they had no data for a particular weather station on the temperature.

Los Angeles Times

Two participants had no data for MSPSS.

BMC Psychiatry

We had no data for any other power lines.

British Journal of Cancer

Five patients had no data for ECG diagnosis of ischemia.

Critical Care

Unfortunately, we had no data for attendance rates by month or season in our study.

BMC Psychiatry

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

41 human-written examples

I have no data for this".

The New York Times

* In one case, a teacher who has taught 4th grade for 5 years has no data for previous years.

The Washington Post

Part of the investor's dilemma is that no matter how much data we have about the past, we have no data for the future.

The New York Times

In 2012, the New York Times Magazine wrote that the Oklahoma City Thunder were "the culmination of 20 years of civic reinvention" and that "the city and its team have undergone a perfect mind meld". Facebook has no data for mind melding (at least, that they're sharing with the public), but the data is consistent with the kind of support the magazine reported.

The New York Times

After initiating the transmission by the AP to an FDN, HD communications will occur if (i) the corresponding FDN has no data for the AP and (ii) other nodes that cannot hear the RTSD have no data for the AP.

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using the phrase "had no data for", clearly specify what the data was needed for to avoid ambiguity. For instance, instead of saying "We had no data for the study", specify "We had no data for the long-term effects of the drug on elderly patients".

Common error

Avoid using "had no data for" without clarifying the context. Ensure the reader understands what specific information was missing, or the statement will lack impact. Be specific.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "had no data for" primarily functions as a statement of fact, indicating the absence of information related to a specific subject. Ludwig confirms that it expresses that something wasn't measured or available for analysis.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

70%

News & Media

20%

Academia

10%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "had no data for" is a grammatically sound and commonly used expression to indicate a lack of information regarding a specific subject. According to Ludwig, this phrase is correct and usable in written English. It frequently appears in scientific, news, and academic contexts to acknowledge limitations or gaps in available information. When using this phrase, it's important to specify the context to avoid ambiguity. While alternatives exist, such as "lacked information regarding" or "possessed no data pertaining to", the core meaning remains consistent. "Had no data for" serves as a clear and direct way to communicate the absence of specific data in various scenarios.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was missing data about

This version focuses on the absence of data, highlighting that the data was expected but not present.

data was unavailable concerning

Similar to "had no available information on", but emphasizes data unaccessibility.

had no available information on

This alternative emphasizes the availability of information, suggesting that the data might exist but was not accessible.

couldn't find any data for

This option emphasizes the effort to locate the data, suggesting it may exist but wasn't retrievable.

lacked information regarding

This alternative replaces "data" with "information" and uses "regarding" instead of "for", slightly formalizing the tone.

no information existed for

This option indicates that there was no data at all about the topic.

did not collect data on

This implies that no effort was made to gather data on the specific topic.

there was an absence of data regarding

This is a more formal construction that emphasizes the lack of data.

possessed no data pertaining to

This option employs more formal vocabulary, using "possessed" and "pertaining to" to indicate the absence of data.

did not have records concerning

This phrase replaces "data" with "records" and uses "concerning" to specify the subject, providing a slightly different perspective.

FAQs

How can I use "had no data for" in a sentence?

You can use "had no data for" to indicate a lack of information or evidence regarding a specific subject. For example, "The researchers "had no data for" the effects of the new drug on elderly patients."

What are some alternatives to "had no data for"?

You can use alternatives like "lacked information regarding", "possessed no data pertaining to", or "did not have records concerning" to express the absence of data.

Is it appropriate to use "had no data for" in formal writing?

Yes, "had no data for" is appropriate in formal writing, especially in scientific or academic contexts where the absence of data needs to be explicitly stated. However, you can also consider using more formal alternatives for a polished tone.

What is the difference between ""had no data for"" and "lacked data on"?

Both phrases indicate a lack of information. However, ""had no data for"" emphasizes the absence of specific data related to a particular subject, while "lacked data on" generally focuses on the overall absence of data regarding a topic. They are largely interchangeable, but context might favor one over the other.