had no consequences

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "had no consequences" is correct and usable in written English. You can use it when discussing actions or events that did not lead to any significant results or effects. Example: "His decision to skip the meeting had no consequences on the project's outcome." Alternative expressions include "resulted in no repercussions" and "had no impact."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

32 human-written examples

Whereas her own complexity seemed to have had no consequences.

The New Yorker

"Billy Budd" could be thought of as America's "Madame Bovary," because it is America's most eloquent and precise novel about the dream of indulging affection's pleasures as if they had no consequences -- so eloquently and precisely that the reader can never again believe they don't.

The New York Times - Books

The anomaly had no consequences for the eventual treatment.

Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction

In severe heart failure, 123I-mIBG myocardial uptake is low and we assumed that the crosstalk and scatter of 123I in the 99mTc photopeak had no consequences.

EJNMMI Physics

Having a MD had no consequences on organ retrieval in general (p = 0.25), but was significantly associated with a decrease in heart retrieval opportunities (p = 0.036).

Annals of Intensive Care

But a force spokeswoman said the failure to act on the internal review, conducted by CQC's head of regulatory risk and quality Louise Dineley, "had no consequences for the health care provision for the people of Cumbria".

BBC

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

28 human-written examples

In 52 cases (19.8% of IHT), equipment-related incidents had no consequence on the patient.

Annals of Intensive Care

This ectopic targeting of Bub1p, Bub3p and Mad3p to telomeres had no consequence on cell cycle progression.

Plosone

Most of them (95%) had no consequence for the patients.

Emergency Medicine Journal

Responses on the inactive lever had no consequence.

Behavioural Brain Research

Most AE had no consequence for azacitidine treatment (66%%).

Annals of Hematology

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "had no consequences", ensure the context clearly establishes what action or event is being referred to, and why it's expected to have results. This prevents ambiguity and strengthens your argument.

Common error

Avoid using "had no consequences" when there might be subtle, long-term, or indirect effects. Overlooking these nuances weakens credibility; instead, acknowledge them or choose a more precise phrase like "had no immediate consequences".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "had no consequences" functions as a predicate in a sentence, indicating that a specific action, event, or condition did not result in any significant effects or outcomes. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase is grammatically sound and clear in its purpose.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

60%

News & Media

40%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "had no consequences" serves to negate the existence of significant outcomes or repercussions resulting from a specific event or action. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, the phrase is grammatically correct and is most commonly found in scientific and news contexts. Alternative phrases like "had no effect" or "made no difference" can be used depending on the specific nuance you wish to convey. Remember to ensure the context is clear to avoid ambiguity and consider whether subtle or long-term effects might exist before definitively stating that something "had no consequences". The phrase holds a neutral register, making it appropriate for a range of writing styles.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

had no effect

Replaces "consequences" with the more general term "effect", indicating a lack of any impact whatsoever.

had no impact

Substitutes "consequences" with "impact", suggesting a lack of significant influence.

made no difference

Emphasizes the lack of change or alteration resulting from an action or event.

had no repercussions

Highlights the absence of negative or adverse effects following an action.

was inconsequential

Uses an adjective to describe something as unimportant or insignificant in its effects.

proved to be harmless

Focuses on the lack of any damaging or detrimental results.

didn't matter

A more informal way of saying something had no importance or effect.

bore no fruit

Implies that an effort or action failed to produce any positive results or outcomes.

left no trace

Indicates the complete absence of any lasting sign or effect.

had a null result

Specifically indicates a failure to achieve a statistically significant outcome, often in scientific contexts.

FAQs

How can I use "had no consequences" in a sentence?

Use "had no consequences" to indicate that a particular action or event did not lead to any significant results or repercussions. For example, "His late arrival "had no consequences" because the meeting hadn't started yet."

What are some alternatives to "had no consequences"?

You can use alternatives such as "had no effect", "had no impact", or "made no difference" depending on the context.

Is it better to say "had no consequence" or "had no consequences"?

"Had no consequences" is generally preferred when referring to a range of potential outcomes. "Had no consequence" can be used when referring to a single, specific outcome that did not occur.

What's the difference between "had no impact" and "had no consequences"?

While similar, "had no impact" often suggests a lack of significant influence or effect, while ""had no consequences"" implies that there were no resulting outcomes or repercussions following a specific event.