Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

had interviewed

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "had interviewed" is correct and usable in written English.
It is typically used to indicate that an interview took place before another event in the past. Example: "By the time the committee made their decision, I had interviewed several candidates for the position."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

57 human-written examples

No one had interviewed them.

News & Media

The New Yorker

He had interviewed people in Moscow.

News & Media

The New Yorker

Archer said police had interviewed witnesses and were investigating.

News & Media

Independent

They had interviewed 700 witnesses and reviewed countless documents.

News & Media

The New York Times

She had interviewed LaDue for two and a half hours.

News & Media

The New Yorker

Showalter had interviewed with the Mets and the Cubs.

Mr. Tyre had interviewed with Accenture, formerly Andersen Consulting.

News & Media

The New York Times

"I had interviewed him before he went to jail.

An earlier version said Alistair Webster QC had interviewed complainants.

News & Media

The Guardian

He declined to say whether federal prosecutors had interviewed him.

News & Media

The New York Times
Show more...

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

1 human-written examples

On Friday, Mark Messier confirmed that he had interviewed for the Rangers' coaching job.

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "had interviewed" to clearly establish that the interview occurred before another past action or time. This helps maintain a clear timeline in your writing.

Common error

Avoid using "had interviewed" when a simple past tense ("interviewed") is sufficient. Use the past perfect only when it's crucial to show that the interview preceded another event.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

87%

Authority and reliability

4.6/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "had interviewed" functions as a past perfect verb phrase. It indicates an action (interviewing) completed at some point before another action in the past. Ludwig examples show its use in various narrative and reporting contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

88%

Science

6%

Formal & Business

3%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "had interviewed" is a past perfect verb phrase used to indicate that an interview occurred before another event in the past. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and prevalence, particularly in journalistic and formal writing. While the simple past tense "interviewed" may often suffice, "had interviewed" is useful for clarifying the sequence of events. Examples from Ludwig indicate that it is most commonly used in News & Media and Science sources. Consider alternatives like "conducted an interview with" depending on context. As such, it's important to use "had interviewed" to clearly establish a past sequence of actions in your writing.

FAQs

How do I use "had interviewed" in a sentence?

Use "had interviewed" to indicate an action of interviewing that was completed before another action in the past. For example, "By the time the report was published, the journalist "had interviewed" all key witnesses."

What are some alternatives to "had interviewed"?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives such as "conducted an interview with", "spoken with", or "held discussions with".

Is it always necessary to use "had interviewed" or is "interviewed" sometimes better?

Use "had interviewed" only when you need to emphasize that the interviewing happened before another point in the past. If the sequence is clear from context, "interviewed" is often sufficient.

What's the difference between "had interviewed" and "interviewed"?

"Had interviewed" is in the past perfect tense, indicating an action completed before another action in the past. "Interviewed" is in the simple past tense, indicating a completed action at a specific time in the past. If you already mention an event in the past you should use "had interviewed".

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

87%

Authority and reliability

4.6/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: