Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

had failed

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

'had failed' is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to talk about something that happened in the past before something else occurred. For example: "He had failed the test, so he was not allowed to move on to the next level."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

But I had failed.

News & Media

The New York Times

His kidneys had failed.

The assault had failed.

News & Media

The New York Times

Ludendorff's gamble had failed.

News & Media

Independent

The chemotherapy had failed.

News & Media

The New Yorker

All had failed other therapies.

News & Media

The New York Times

A regional approach had failed.

News & Media

The New York Times

Two breakers had failed simultaneously.

News & Media

The New York Times

Western mediation efforts had failed.

They all had failed him.

News & Media

The New York Times

But I had failed worse.

News & Media

The New Yorker
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "had failed" to clearly establish that an action was unsuccessful before another past event occurred. This helps to maintain a clear chronological order in your writing.

Common error

Avoid using "had failed" when a simple past tense ("failed") is sufficient. "Had failed" is specifically for indicating an action that was completed before another point in the past.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

84%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "had failed" functions as a verb phrase in the past perfect tense. It indicates that an action or event was unsuccessful before another action or time in the past, as illustrated by Ludwig's examples.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

53%

Wiki

13%

Science

12%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

7%

Huffington Post

7%

Forbes

3%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "had failed" is a verb phrase in the past perfect tense used to indicate that an action or event was unsuccessful before another action in the past. As Ludwig AI confirms, its grammatical status is correct. Its frequent usage in news and encyclopedic sources is because of the need for clear sequencing of past events. When writing, ensure that using the past perfect is necessary to avoid errors with tense sequencing. Consider alternatives such as "didn't succeed" or "was unsuccessful" to vary your language.

FAQs

How is "had failed" used in a sentence?

Use "had failed" to indicate an action that was unsuccessful before another event in the past. For example, "The experiment "had failed" before the researchers published their findings."

What are some alternatives to "had failed"?

You can use phrases like "didn't succeed", "was unsuccessful", or "proved fruitless" as alternatives to "had failed", depending on the context.

Is it correct to say "failed" instead of "had failed"?

Yes, "failed" (simple past) is correct when describing a single event in the past. "Had failed" (past perfect) is used to indicate that the failure occurred before another past event.

What's the difference between "had failed" and "failed"?

"Failed" describes a simple past action. "Had failed" indicates a past action completed before another action in the past. For instance, "He failed the test" vs. "He "had failed" the test before he decided to study harder."

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

84%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: