had been reviewed

USAGE SUMMARY

"had been reviewed" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when talking about something that was examined or considered in the past. For example, "The proposal had been reviewed before it was approved."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Weiner pointed out that none of her books had been reviewed by the Times.

Princeton University

"The transactions in question had been reviewed with our auditors and the accounting was proper".

The New York Times

Mr. Stickel, who isn't a lawyer, said the tool had been reviewed by multiple lawyers.

The New York Times

She said she thought the documents had been reviewed by outside lawyers.

The Guardian - Business

The heavily redacted report did not include the names of those whose files had been reviewed.

The New York Times

The arrangement had been reviewed: still favouring Warner, but now to the tune of 51/49.

The Guardian - Film

He added that the case had been reviewed a number of times.

The Guardian

announced that the Sentinel program would be held up until it had been reviewed.

The New Yorker

The inspection report, he said, did not mention that sterility test reports had been reviewed.

The New York Times - Health

But Mr. Hoover said that the situation there had been "reviewed".

The New York Times

All of these parts had been reviewed at some point or another but never combined on such a large scale.

Cornell University

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When specifying who conducted the review, use 'by': 'The document had been reviewed by the committee'.

Common error

Avoid using "has been reviewed" when the action of reviewing occurred and finished in the past before another past action. Use "had been reviewed" to clearly establish the sequence of past events.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "had been reviewed" functions as a passive perfect construction, indicating that a subject received the action of being examined or evaluated prior to another point in time. Ludwig AI confirms its correct usage in written English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

40%

Science

30%

Academia

15%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Encyclopedias

5%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "had been reviewed" is a grammatically correct and frequently used phrase indicating that something was examined before a specific point in the past. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase is appropriate for various contexts, particularly in news, science, and academia. To ensure clarity, remember to use it when you want to establish a clear sequence of past events. Avoid using it interchangeably with "was reviewed" or "has been reviewed", as these tenses convey different meanings. By following these guidelines, you can confidently and accurately use "had been reviewed" in your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

had undergone review

Rephrases the sentence structure while maintaining the core meaning.

had been examined

Replaces "reviewed" with "examined", implying a more detailed or thorough inspection.

had been inspected

Uses "inspected" instead of "reviewed", suggesting a formal or official examination.

had been assessed

Substitutes "reviewed" with "assessed", focusing on the evaluation aspect.

had been evaluated

Replaces "reviewed" with "evaluated", emphasizing a judgment of value or quality.

had been scrutinized

Replaces "reviewed" with "scrutinized", suggesting a very careful and critical examination.

had been checked

Uses the more informal "checked" instead of "reviewed", implying a quick verification.

had been reconsidered

Implies a second or subsequent review, suggesting a previous assessment took place.

had been audited

Substitutes "reviewed" with "audited", implying a systematic and independent examination of records.

had been revised

Focuses on the aspect of making changes after the review process.

FAQs

How can I use "had been reviewed" in a sentence?

Use "had been reviewed" to indicate that something was examined or assessed before a specific point in the past. For example, "The proposal "had been reviewed" before the meeting took place".

What are some alternatives to "had been reviewed"?

You can use alternatives such as "had been examined", "had been assessed", or "had undergone review" depending on the context.

Is it correct to say "has been reviewed" instead of "had been reviewed"?

The choice depends on the context. "Has been reviewed" indicates a past action with present relevance, while "had been reviewed" indicates an action completed before another point in the past.

What is the difference between "had been reviewed" and "was reviewed"?

"Had been reviewed" implies the reviewing action was completed before another action in the past. "Was reviewed" simply states that the review happened at some point in the past, without necessarily linking it to another past event.