Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

had been restored

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "had been restored" is correct and usable in written English.
It is typically used to indicate that something was returned to a previous state or condition in the past before another event occurred. Example: "After years of neglect, the historic building had been restored to its former glory."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Sports

Travel

Technology

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Civility had been restored.

News & Media

The New York Times

The bond had been restored.

Law and order had been restored.

News & Media

The New York Times

By today, order had been restored.

News & Media

The New York Times

The natural order had been restored.

The bank announced last night that service had been restored.

News & Media

Independent

By the evening, those operations had been restored.

News & Media

The New York Times

It was as though he had been restored.

News & Media

The New Yorker

By 8 54 a.m. on Monday, service had been restored.

News & Media

The New York Times

After sight had been restored, Sinha posed Molyneux's question.

News & Media

The New Yorker

Eight garbage trucks had been restored to working order.

News & Media

The New York Times
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "had been restored" to clearly indicate that an action of restoring occurred before another point in the past. This emphasizes the sequence of events.

Common error

Avoid using "was restored" when you need to emphasize that the restoration happened before another event in the past. "Was restored" doesn't provide the same sense of sequential timing as "had been restored".

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

85%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "had been restored" functions as the past perfect passive voice. This grammatical structure indicates that a subject received an action (restoration) that was completed before another point in the past. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase is grammatically correct and frequently encountered.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

75%

Wiki

10%

Encyclopedias

5%

Less common in

Academia

3%

Sports

2%

Formal & Business

0.01%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "had been restored" is a grammatically sound and frequently used expression, as confirmed by Ludwig AI. Functioning as the past perfect passive voice, it indicates that something was returned to a previous state before another event occurred in the past. Its versatility is evident across various contexts, including news reports, historical accounts, and descriptions of physical repairs. When writing, remember that "had been restored" emphasizes the sequence of events more clearly than "was restored". Consider alternatives like "was reinstated" or "was repaired" depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

FAQs

How do I use "had been restored" in a sentence?

"Had been restored" indicates that something was restored at a point in the past before another action took place. For example, "By the time the guests arrived, the garden "had been restored" to its original beauty".

What are some alternatives to "had been restored"?

Depending on the context, you can use phrases like "was reinstated", "was repaired", or "was recovered" to convey a similar meaning.

What's the difference between "was restored" and "had been restored"?

"Was restored" typically describes a single action in the past, while "had been restored" indicates an action completed before another past event. Using "had been restored" emphasizes the sequence of events.

Is it correct to say "had been restore" instead of "had been restored"?

No, "had been restore" is grammatically incorrect. The correct form is ""had been restored"", using the past participle form of the verb 'restore'.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

85%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: