Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

had been raised

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

"had been raised" is correct and commonly used in written English.
It is used to express that something happened before the present. For example: "He was aware of the issue because it had been raised multiple times in the past."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

A ransom had been raised.

News & Media

The Economist

She had been raised in Cuzco.

News & Media

The New Yorker

Doubts had been raised.

Nonetheless, the issues had been raised.

But questions had been raised about Moolah.

Floor plates had been raised and lowered.

News & Media

The New York Times

Forrestal had been raised in a religious household.

Anya had been raised by the Iskanderov family.

News & Media

Independent

Atterbury had been raised on the Midwestern carnival circuit.

News & Media

The New Yorker

She had been raised a Presbyterian and embraced Buddhism.

News & Media

The New York Times
Show more...

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

1 human-written examples

Esteen, 26, had been raised in this house.

News & Media

Los Angeles Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "had been raised", ensure the context clearly establishes the sequence of events, indicating that the raising occurred before another action or point in time. This helps maintain clarity and avoids ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "had been raised" when a simple past tense would suffice. Overusing the past perfect can make your writing sound unnecessarily complex. Only use it when you need to clearly show that an action happened before another action in the past.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

86%

Authority and reliability

4.6/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "had been raised" functions as a past perfect passive construction. It indicates that an action of raising occurred and was completed before a specific point in the past. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and common usage.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

52%

Academia

24%

Science

15%

Less common in

Wiki

6%

Formal & Business

3%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "had been raised" is a grammatically sound and frequently used past perfect passive construction. As highlighted by Ludwig, its primary function is to indicate that an action of raising took place before another event in the past. It is predominantly found in news, academic, and scientific contexts, making it suitable for various writing styles. When using "had been raised", ensure that the tense sequencing accurately reflects the chronology of events and that the context is clear to avoid potential ambiguity. Also, remember that alternatives such as "were brought up" or "were elevated" can be used based on the specific context and desired emphasis.

FAQs

How can I use "had been raised" in a sentence?

Use "had been raised" to indicate that something was brought up, elevated, or cultivated before a specific point in the past. For example, "By the time I arrived, the flag "had been raised"."

What are some alternatives to "had been raised"?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives such as "were brought up", "were elevated", or "were nurtured".

Is it ever incorrect to use "had been raised"?

Yes, it's incorrect if the sequence of events doesn't require emphasizing that the action happened before another past action. In such cases, the simple past tense is sufficient. For instance, instead of "The rent "had been raised"", using "The rent was raised" might be more appropriate if there's no need to highlight the prior action.

What's the difference between "had been raised" and "was raised"?

"Had been raised" indicates an action completed before another point in the past, emphasizing the sequence. "Was raised" simply states that the action happened in the past without necessarily relating it to another event. For example: "He "had been raised" in a strict environment before he moved away." versus "He was raised in a strict environment."

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

86%

Authority and reliability

4.6/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: