Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

had been committed

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

"had been committed" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
It is the past perfect tense of the verb "to commit" and is used to describe an action that was completed in the past before another action or event in the past. Example: The crime had been committed long before the police arrived at the scene.

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

57 human-written examples

No crime had been committed".

Police later said no offence had been committed.

News & Media

Independent

Indeed, countless crimes had been committed in the attempt.

No one alleged a crime had been committed.

News & Media

The New York Times

Hilliard said he felt a fraud had been committed.

News & Media

The Guardian

The crime had been committed a year earlier.

Investigators didn't even know if a crime had been committed.

None of this meant that a crime had been committed.

News & Media

The Guardian
Show more...

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

3 human-written examples

The officer had already determined no crime had been committed.

News & Media

Huffington Post

And at that point, no crime had been committed.

Delict, in Roman law, an obligation to pay a penalty because a wrong had been committed.

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "had been committed" to clearly indicate that an action was completed before another point in the past. This helps establish a clear timeline of events.

Common error

Avoid using "has been committed" when referring to an action completed before a specific point in the past. "Has been committed" implies the action is relevant to the present, while "had been committed" establishes a past-before-past relationship.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

83%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "had been committed" functions as the past perfect passive form of the verb "commit". It indicates that an action was completed at some point in the past before another action also in the past. Ludwig AI confirms the proper grammatical use across various contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

41%

Encyclopedias

11%

Science

9%

Less common in

Wiki

4%

Formal & Business

4%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "had been committed" is a grammatically correct and frequently used phrase to describe an action completed before another point in the past. As confirmed by Ludwig, it functions as the past perfect passive voice. While suitable for various contexts, including news, encyclopedias, and scientific writing, it excels at establishing a clear sequence of events. When using this phrase, ensure you're emphasizing the past-before-past relationship. Consider alternatives like "was perpetrated" or "was carried out" for similar meanings. Ludwig's analysis underscores the phrase's reliability and versatility in conveying completed past actions.

FAQs

How to use "had been committed" in a sentence?

Use "had been committed" to describe an action that was completed before another action or time in the past. For example, "The crime "had been committed" before the police arrived".

What can I say instead of "had been committed"?

You can use alternatives like "was perpetrated", "was carried out", or "was brought about" depending on the context.

What is the difference between "has been committed" and "had been committed"?

"Has been committed" indicates an action completed recently with present relevance, while "had been committed" indicates an action completed before a specific point in the past.

Is it correct to say "the crime was committed" instead of "the crime had been committed"?

Yes, "the crime was committed" is grammatically correct. However, "the crime "had been committed"" is more appropriate when you want to emphasize that the crime occurred before another event in the past.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

83%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: