had agreed with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "had agreed with" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when indicating that someone reached a consensus or understanding with another person or group in the past. Example: "After much discussion, they had agreed with the proposed changes to the project."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

And Emer had agreed with him.

The New Yorker

The players had agreed with MLB to accept the suspensions.

The Guardian - Sport

He had agreed with the lawyers that there would be no more testimony for the day.

The New York Times

The Federal Trade Commission said it had agreed with the advertisers on crucial principles.

The New York Times

He said that the current board had agreed with his assessment.

The New York Times

He had agreed with her not to include the reference to the bishop, she claimed.

The Guardian

Steve Phillips, the Mets' general manager, said Wednesday that Valentine had agreed with the changes.

The New York Times - Sports

Harman said only that the governor had agreed with the government's initial fiscal stimulus.

The Guardian

I would have been seriously concerned only if 'the compact majority' had agreed with me.

The Guardian - Books

Min had agreed with her mother that it wouldn't hurt to meet the professor.

The New Yorker

The judge had agreed with one crucial matter: the overriding public interest was in the information being released.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "had agreed with" to clearly indicate that an agreement or consensus was reached in the past. This phrasing emphasizes the completed nature of the agreement.

Common error

Avoid using "had agreed with" when referring to a current agreement. Use "agree with" or "have agreed with" instead to indicate a present state of agreement.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "had agreed with" functions as a past perfect verb phrase, indicating a state of agreement that occurred before a specific time or event in the past. Ludwig shows many examples of its use in reporting past decisions and consensus.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

80%

Wiki

10%

Science

5%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

1%

Formal & Business

2%

Academia

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "had agreed with" is a grammatically sound and frequently used past perfect verb phrase. Ludwig AI confirms its correct usage. It serves to indicate that an agreement or consensus was reached in the past, often before another event took place. The phrase is versatile, suitable for news reporting, formal discussions, and everyday communication. Key alternatives include "had concurred with" and "had seen eye to eye with". However, using it in reference to a present agreement should be avoided, as it denotes a completed action.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

had concurred with

Replaces 'agreed' with a more formal synonym, implying a formal agreement.

had been of one mind with

Emphasizes complete agreement and unity of thought.

had been in accord with

Indicates a state of agreement, focusing on harmony and alignment.

had seen eye to eye with

Emphasizes shared viewpoints and understanding.

had come to an understanding with

Highlights the process of reaching an agreement.

had reached a consensus with

Focuses on collective agreement after discussion.

had found common ground with

Highlights the discovery of shared interests or beliefs.

had settled with

Implies resolving a dispute or coming to terms.

had stipulated with

Suggests a formal arrangement or condition.

had made arrangements with

Focuses on making plans or preparations in agreement.

FAQs

How can I use "had agreed with" in a sentence?

Use "had agreed with" to show a past consensus between two or more parties. For example, "The committee "had agreed with" the proposed budget cuts".

What's a formal alternative to "had agreed with"?

A formal alternative is "had concurred with". For example, "The board had concurred with the CEO's strategic vision".

Is there a difference between "had agreed with" and "agreed with"?

"Had agreed with" indicates a past agreement, while "agree with" suggests a present or ongoing agreement. The past perfect emphasizes the completion of the agreement at a specific point in time before another action.

What can I say instead of "had agreed with" to emphasize shared viewpoints?

You could say "had seen eye to eye with", which emphasizes mutual understanding and similar opinions.