Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
had a discussion with
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
"had a discussion with" is correct and can be used in written English.
You can use it when you need to emphasize that you had a formal conversation with someone about a specific topic. Example sentence: I had a discussion with my professor about my final paper.
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Science
Alternative expressions(20)
engaged in dialogue with
consulted with
spoke with
talked to
negotiated with
Had a conversation with
Spoke with
Consulted with
Communicated with
had a debate with
had a conversation with
had a dialogue with
had a consultation with
had a child with
had a rapport with
had a nightmare with
had a talk with
had a meeting with
had a list with
had a relationship with
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
All women, in whom contraception was discussed, had had a discussion with their psychiatrist around teratogenic potential of their medication.
Science
I had a discussion with Godard ….
News & Media
Shonibare said he had a discussion with Kate about "how wonderful art is".
News & Media
In fact, I just had a discussion with our music supervisor.
News & Media
First, the oncologist said, she had a discussion with him alone.
News & Media
When I arrived this morning, I had a discussion with the Apple security team.
News & Media
We had a discussion with them last week and raised some concerns around public order.
News & Media
In January, Mr. Sokol accumulated about $10 million in shares of Lubrizol and had a discussion with Lubrizol's chief executive.
News & Media
"I've said hello to her and shaken her hand, but have never had a discussion with her".
News & Media
"After I went, they even had a discussion with Juventus to sell Modric, because they didn't believe in him.
News & Media
"We had a discussion with them and they said they were looking seriously at this," said the spokeswoman.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Use "had a discussion with" when emphasizing a deliberate, focused conversation involving specific topics or issues. It's appropriate for both formal and informal contexts.
Common error
Avoid using "had a discussion with" in contexts where a simpler term like "spoke with" or "talked to" suffices. Overuse can make your writing sound unnecessarily formal or verbose.
Source & Trust
88%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "had a discussion with" functions as a verb phrase indicating an act of formal or informal communication between two or more parties. Ludwig provides numerous examples illustrating its broad applicability. As pointed out by Ludwig AI, it emphasizes a deliberate, focused conversation.
Frequent in
News & Media
66%
Science
13%
Formal & Business
5%
Less common in
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "had a discussion with" is a versatile phrase used to describe a communication event, suitable for both formal and informal contexts. Ludwig's examples reveal its common usage across diverse sources like News & Media and Science, demonstrating its broad applicability. While grammatically sound and widely accepted, as confirmed by Ludwig AI, writers should be mindful of potential overuse and consider simpler alternatives where appropriate. Remember to use this phrase when you want to emphasize a deliberate and focused conversation on specific topics.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
Had a conversation with
A more general phrase that doesn't necessarily imply a structured or focused exchange.
Engaged in dialogue with
Implies a more formal and structured exchange of ideas, often with a specific purpose.
Conversed with
Focuses on the act of exchanging thoughts and ideas; more informal than "had a discussion with".
Held talks with
Suggests a series of discussions, usually on a specific topic or negotiation.
Spoke with
A general term for talking to someone; less formal and specific than "had a discussion with".
Exchanged views with
Focuses on the sharing of opinions and perspectives.
Talked with
Similar to "spoke with", but can imply a more casual conversation.
Consulted with
Implies seeking advice or expert opinion; more formal and specific than "had a discussion with".
Negotiated with
Implies a discussion aimed at reaching an agreement.
Communicated with
A broad term that encompasses various means of exchanging information; less personal than "had a discussion with".
FAQs
What's a more formal way to say "had a discussion with"?
For a more formal tone, consider using phrases like "engaged in dialogue with" or "consulted with", depending on the context.
How can I make "had a discussion with" sound less formal?
To make it less formal, you could use "spoke with" or "talked to". These options are suitable for casual conversations.
When should I use "had a conversation with" instead of "had a discussion with"?
"Had a conversation with" is generally used for informal exchanges, while "had a discussion with" implies a more structured and purposeful interaction.
What's the difference between "had a discussion with" and "negotiated with"?
"Had a discussion with" is a general term for talking about something, whereas "negotiated with" specifically implies a discussion aimed at reaching an agreement or compromise.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
88%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested