grouped into four types

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "grouped into four types" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when categorizing or classifying items, concepts, or data into four distinct categories. Example: "The data collected from the survey can be grouped into four types: demographic, behavioral, attitudinal, and geographic."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

9 human-written examples

Cluster analysis reveals that the variety of organizational formats of collaborative projects can be grouped into four types, ranging from bureaucratic to participatory.

Research Policy

Analyses of several response surface plots obtained by employing statistical designs in lipase catalysed esterification reactions have indicated that such plots could be grouped into four types to explain esterification behaviour in the presence of different kinds of substrates and reaction conditions.

Process Biochemistry

The multipath signals are grouped into four types according to the form and order of reflection.

EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing

The behavior of the parameter inverting process can be grouped into four types.

Petroleum Science

Nanoparticles can be grouped into four types as carbon-based nanomaterials, metal nanoparticles, denderimers, and nanocomposites [1, 2, 3, 4].

International Nano Letters

The 20 amino acid substitutions were grouped into four "types" in order to be consistent with previous reports (Wong et al. 2007, 2006; Verma et al. 2014).

Bioresources and Bioprocessing

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

51 human-written examples

These rules could be grouped into two types.

Engineering Geology

Commercially built composting toilets can be grouped into two types by size and intended use.

Britannica

Chemosterilants can be grouped into two types of compounds, depending on their action.

Britannica

The GmTPSs are grouped into six types based on gene architecture and sequence identity.

Gene

The surface functional groups are grouped into three types, namely carboxyl-type, carbonyl-type, and hydroxyl-type.

Carbon

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "grouped into four types", ensure that each type is clearly defined and mutually exclusive to avoid ambiguity in your classification.

Common error

Avoid grouping items into four "types" where the criteria for each type overlap or are poorly defined. This can lead to confusion and invalidate your categorization.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "grouped into four types" functions as a descriptive term indicating a classification. It signifies that a set of items or data has been categorized into four distinct categories based on shared characteristics. Ludwig AI examples show use in diverse scientific contexts.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

90%

Encyclopedias

5%

Wiki

5%

Less common in

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "grouped into four types" is a common and grammatically correct way to describe a classification process, primarily used in formal and scientific writing. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, this phrase effectively structures information into four distinct categories for improved analysis and understanding. When using this phrase, ensure that each type is well-defined and mutually exclusive. Alternatives like "classified into four categories" or "categorized into four groups" can provide stylistic variation. The term is prevalent in authoritative scientific sources, emphasizing its reliability and appropriateness in academic and professional contexts.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

classified into four categories

Replaces "types" with "categories", a synonym, providing a slight variation in word choice.

categorized into four groups

Uses "categorized" instead of "grouped", and "groups" instead of "types", offering a different wording while maintaining the same meaning.

divided into four classes

Substitutes "grouped" with "divided" and "types" with "classes", altering the phrase's structure slightly.

organized into four sections

Employs "organized" instead of "grouped" and "sections" instead of "types", suggesting a more structured arrangement.

arranged into four kinds

Replaces "grouped" with "arranged" and "types" with "kinds", providing a subtle shift in emphasis.

separated into four sorts

Uses "separated" instead of "grouped" and "sorts" instead of "types", implying a distinction based on certain criteria.

clustered into four segments

Replaces "grouped" with "clustered" and "types" with "segments", suggesting a division based on similarity.

sorted into four divisions

Substitutes "grouped" with "sorted" and "types" with "divisions", implying a systematic arrangement.

compartmentalized into four portions

Uses "compartmentalized" instead of "grouped" and "portions" instead of "types", emphasizing a clear separation.

partitioned into four categories

Replaces "grouped" with "partitioned" and "types" with "categories", highlighting a structured division.

FAQs

How can I use "grouped into four types" in a sentence?

You can use "grouped into four types" to classify a set of items based on shared characteristics. For example: "The survey responses were "grouped into four types" based on age."

What are some alternatives to saying "grouped into four types"?

Alternatives include "classified into four categories", "categorized into four groups", or "divided into four classes".

Is it better to say "grouped into four types" or "divided into four categories"?

Both phrases are grammatically correct, and the choice often depends on the specific context and desired emphasis. "Grouped" suggests a more general collection, while "divided" implies a more structured separation.

What should I consider when using "grouped into four types"?

Ensure that the criteria for each type are well-defined and that the items being grouped fit clearly into one and only one type to maintain clarity and avoid ambiguity.