grouped by classification

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "grouped by classification" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when describing the organization of items, data, or subjects based on specific categories or classifications. Example: "The documents were grouped by classification to facilitate easier access and retrieval."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Wiki

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

The data are grouped by classification technique where regression and classification mode for a particular technique were grouped together (e.g. classification and regression RF).

Journal of Cheminformatics

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

To help distinguish the type of recommendations they were grouped by WHO classification of risk factors influencing adherence to long-term therapies, namely relating to therapy, disease status i.e. having HIV-1, patient factors such as motivation to take therapy, healthcare team and system, and socio-economic circumstances [ 21].

BMC Medical Research Methodology

If genes are grouped by their functional classification, the variation is lowest for genes involved in 'transcription, RNA processing, degradation', 'translation, post-translational modification, degradation' and 'cell division', which are enriched for essential genes.

BMC Genomics

First, staging is grouped by the TNM classification (Table 1) that enables differentiation between good and poor prognostic tumours to allow tailored therapy, and thereby reduce morbidity from overtreatment, while allowing aggressive treatment of high-risk patients.

Cancer Imaging

Figures have been grouped by the four-season classification scheme used by the IMD; year-round averages and totals are also displayed.

Wikipedia

Therefore in PhenoLink, continuous phenotypic measurements are grouped by binning to perform classification analysis instead of regression.

BMC Genomics

Brazilian SBSE papers were grouped by SE area according to our classification schema (Classification schema, Data Extraction and Mapping).

Journal of Software Engineering Research and Development

To determine the risk of Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) associated with exposures to multiple pesticides grouped by various classes, including carcinogenic classifications.

Cancer Causes and Control

In fact, the estimated interference is used by spectral subtraction to extract unvoiced segments, which are then grouped by either simple thresholding or Bayesian classification.

Brain Informatics

There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups by classification with MSP OSS, p = 0.326; PFS, p = 0.342).

BMC Cancer

Other co-existing deformities could influence the outcome as well, and were grouped in a classification as described by Dahl et al. (1994).

Acta Orthopaedica

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "grouped by classification", ensure the classification system is clearly defined and understood by your audience. Providing context or a brief explanation of the classification method can enhance clarity.

Common error

Avoid using "grouped by classification" without specifying the classification criteria. This can lead to ambiguity and confusion for the reader. Always state the basis for the grouping to maintain clarity and precision.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "grouped by classification" functions as a descriptive phrase, specifying how items or data are organized. As Ludwig AI shows, it's frequently used in academic and scientific texts to provide structure and clarity.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

65%

Academia

20%

Wiki

10%

Less common in

News & Media

2%

Formal & Business

2%

Encyclopedias

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "grouped by classification" is a phrase used to describe how items, data, or subjects are organized according to a defined classification system. As evidenced by Ludwig AI and its analysis, this phrase is grammatically correct and frequently appears in scientific, academic, and formal contexts. For clarity, it's crucial to specify the classification criteria when using this phrase. Alternatives include "sorted by category" and "classified according to", depending on the desired level of formality and specificity.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

categorized by type

Focuses on the type as the organizing principle; subtly emphasizes the 'type' aspect.

sorted by category

Implies a more straightforward and simpler arrangement; less formal than "classification".

classified according to

More formal and emphasizes adherence to a specific set of classification rules.

organized by taxonomy

Suggests a hierarchical and structured arrangement, specifically using a taxonomic system.

arranged by species

Specific to biological contexts, suggesting arrangement based on species.

divided by attribute

Focuses on a specific characteristic or attribute as the basis for the grouping.

clustered by feature

Suggests a grouping based on shared features, often used in data analysis.

sectioned by kind

A more general term for dividing items into different kinds or types.

aggregated by class

Suggests bringing together items into classes based on shared traits.

cataloged by system

Implies a systematic and detailed listing of items following a specific system.

FAQs

How can I use "grouped by classification" in a sentence?

You can use "grouped by classification" to describe how data, items, or subjects are organized based on a defined system. For example: "The data was "grouped by classification" to reveal trends."

What are some alternatives to "grouped by classification"?

Alternatives include "sorted by category", "categorized by type", or "classified according to". The best choice depends on the specific context and the level of formality required.

Is there a difference between "grouped by classification" and "sorted by category"?

"Grouped by classification" generally implies a more structured or formal categorization system, while "sorted by category" is a more general term for arrangement. The choice depends on the specific context.

When is it appropriate to use "grouped by classification"?

It's appropriate when you want to emphasize a structured, systematic approach to organizing information based on predefined criteria. This is common in scientific, academic, and formal contexts.