group under

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "group under" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when categorizing or classifying items, people, or concepts into a specific group or category. Example: "We will group under the new policy all employees who work remotely."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

They're a pop group under siege.

The New York Times

MSCI has another group, under emerging, known as "frontier".

The New York Times

It's on Mark Stoops to get his group under control.

The New York Times

The Packers have always been a resilient group under Mike McCarthy.

The Guardian - Sport

He said the committee wanted to keep this rapidly growing group under review.

The Guardian

The core group, under Chung Mong Hun, maintained a shaky hold on second place, after Samsung.

The New York Times

"Then there's the group under 40 to 45, they are recent arrivals to Portland," Moore said.

The Guardian

Practically every election cycle has cast a different group under the same polarizing label.

The New Yorker

Tells about this group under the leadership of Father Iran Huu Thanh.

The New Yorker

The clubhouse Cherington gave him hardly resembled the dysfunctional, overmatched group under his predecessor, Bobby Valentine.

The New York Times - Sports

However, the IMC said it had decided to keep the group under review.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Consider the context. "Group under" can imply a hierarchical relationship, so use it when that implication is appropriate. Otherwise, consider alternatives like "category including" or "collection of".

Common error

Avoid using "group under" when simply listing items without implying a formal structure or management. For a less formal arrangement, opt for alternatives like "collection of" or "set of."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "group under" functions primarily as a prepositional phrase indicating a hierarchical structure, categorization, or supervision. Examples from Ludwig show its use in diverse contexts, from scientific studies to news reports, supporting this categorization. According to Ludwig AI, the phrase is correct and usable.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

37%

Science

35%

Wiki

12%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

2%

Formal & Business

5%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "group under" is a versatile prepositional phrase commonly used to indicate that items, individuals, or concepts are categorized, organized, or supervised within a specific hierarchical or structured framework. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and usability. With examples spanning news, science, and wiki sources, it shows adaptability to various registers from neutral to professional. The phrase is particularly frequent in News & Media and Science contexts. When using "group under", clarity about the criteria for inclusion is key. Consider whether alternatives might provide a more precise nuance, and be cautious about implying a hierarchy where none exists.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

team led by

Focuses on leadership of a team rather than a broader grouping.

section headed by

Focuses on the leadership of a section.

division within

Specifies a hierarchical structure within an organization.

organization managed by

Emphasizes the management structure of the organization.

department overseen by

Specifies the oversight of a department.

category including

Highlights the act of inclusion within a category.

classification of

Emphasizes the process of classifying items.

unit controlled by

Highlights the control aspect within a unit.

subset governed by

Focuses on the governing rules of a subset.

collection curated by

Highlights curation instead of simple grouping.

FAQs

How can I use "group under" in a sentence?

You can use "group under" to indicate a hierarchical structure or categorization, such as "The projects are grouped under the department head" or "The expenses are grouped under travel and accommodation."

What are some alternatives to "group under"?

Alternatives include "classified as", "categorized within", "led by", or "managed by", depending on the specific context and nuance you wish to convey.

When is it appropriate to use "group under" versus "grouped by"?

"Group under" suggests a hierarchical structure or a level of supervision, while "grouped by" indicates a categorization based on shared attributes. For example, tasks are "grouped under" a manager, while data might be "grouped by" date.

Is there a difference between "group under" and "subgroup of"?

"Group under" implies a broader, more general categorization, whereas "subgroup of" indicates a more specific, nested relationship. Use "group under" when items are broadly categorized, and "subgroup of" when they represent a subset within a larger group.