gross violations

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "gross violations" is correct and usable in written English.
It is typically used to describe serious breaches of laws, rules, or ethical standards, often in the context of human rights or legal matters. Example: "The report highlighted the gross violations of human rights that occurred during the conflict."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Formal & Business

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

There are gross violations.

The Guardian

A quick rundown of the list reveals all my gross violations: 1.

The New Yorker

"There continue to be gross violations of human rights by Pakistani security forces".

The New York Times

And neither side is accused of gross violations of human rights.

The New York Times

"The current administration is not going to step in unless there are gross violations," he said.

The New York Times

The delegation found evidence of a string of gross violations, giving hope to campaigners that the watchdog would act.

Independent

"If someone tries to make gross violations of international law a norm, then we will create chaos," Mr. Lavrov warned.

The New York Times

He called on the prosecutor general's office to investigate what he called "gross violations" of Russian law.

The New York Times

HUMAN RIGHTS -- The sovereignty of states must no longer be used as a shield for gross violations of human rights.

The New York Times

Prosecutors are prepared to reach far beyond their own lands to put on trial political figures accused of gross violations.

The New York Times

A UN report on the situation this week said there were gross violations of human rights "on a massive scale".

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing legal or ethical breaches, use "gross violations" to emphasize the severity and unacceptability of the actions. This phrase is especially impactful when referring to human rights or international law.

Common error

Avoid using "gross violations" in casual conversation or informal writing. The phrase carries a strong, formal tone and may sound exaggerated or inappropriate in less serious settings.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "gross violations" functions as a noun phrase where the adjective "gross" modifies the noun "violations". It describes serious and unacceptable breaches of established rules, laws, or ethical standards. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

57%

Formal & Business

18%

Encyclopedias

5%

Less common in

Science

5%

Wiki

2%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "gross violations" is a grammatically correct and frequently used term, primarily found in formal contexts such as news reports and legal documents. According to Ludwig AI, it serves to describe serious breaches of laws, rules, or ethical standards. The phrase is particularly common when discussing human rights, international law, or corporate governance. When writing, it's best to reserve "gross violations" for situations that warrant a high degree of severity and formality, avoiding its use in casual or informal contexts. Alternatives like "severe breaches" or "serious infringements" may be suitable depending on the specific nuance desired. The consistent use across authoritative sources reinforces its validity and impact in professional communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

severe breaches

This alternative uses "breaches" instead of "violations", implying a break or failure to observe a law, agreement, or code of conduct; "severe" emphasizes the seriousness.

serious infringements

"Infringements" suggests an act of breaking the terms of a law or agreement, while "serious" highlights the gravity of the act.

egregious transgressions

"Transgressions" refers to acts that go against a law, rule, or code of conduct; "egregious" emphasizes that these acts are outstandingly bad or shocking.

flagrant abuses

"Abuses" refers to the improper use of something, often power or privilege; "flagrant" emphasizes that the abuse is conspicuously or blatantly offensive.

outrageous contraventions

"Contraventions" means an action that violates a law, treaty, or other ruling; "outrageous" indicates that these actions are shockingly bad or excessive.

major derelictions

"Derelictions" refers to the state of failing to carry out a duty or obligation; "major" indicates that these failures are significant.

grave offenses

"Offenses" denotes a breach of law or moral principle; "grave" indicates that these breaches are serious or alarming.

substantial non-compliance

This alternative phrase focuses on the failure to adhere to rules or standards to a significant degree.

significant lapses

"Lapses" refers to temporary failures of concentration, memory, or judgment; "significant" suggests that these failures have important consequences.

criminal neglect

This alternative emphasizes that the violations stem from a culpable failure to take care of something or someone.

FAQs

How can I use "gross violations" in a sentence?

You can use "gross violations" to describe serious breaches of laws, rules, or ethical standards. For example: "The report detailed the "gross violations" of international law committed during the conflict."

What are some alternatives to "gross violations"?

Alternatives include "severe breaches", "serious infringements", or "egregious transgressions" depending on the specific context.

Is it more appropriate to say "serious violations" or "gross violations"?

"Gross violations" emphasizes a higher degree of severity and unacceptability compared to "serious violations". Use "gross violations" when you want to highlight the extreme nature of the breach.

What kind of actions are typically referred to as "gross violations"?

"Gross violations" are typically used to describe actions like human rights abuses, war crimes, and serious breaches of international law or corporate governance procedures.