Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
gross fallacy
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "gross fallacy" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe a significant or serious error in reasoning or belief. Example: "The argument presented in the debate was based on a gross fallacy that undermined its credibility."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Science
Encyclopedias
Alternative expressions(4)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
2 human-written examples
It's a gross fallacy, which unfortunately has taken root, that the human indexer has been made redundant by the search engine.
News & Media
It's a gross fallacy to imagine that there were ever hermetically sealed traditions that correspond to a writer's racial or ethnic or sexual or national identity.
News & Media
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
57 human-written examples
Introducing his own interpretation, he says, "No one has yet proposed a reading of the dialogue as a consecutive demonstration which does not turn it into an improbable medley of gross fallacies and logical subtleties" (1990: 193).
Science
This is a complete fallacy.
News & Media
As much as the history of science is a history of enlightenment and discovery, it is also a history of gross generalizations, blunders, prejudices and fallacies that are eventually proven wrong.
News & Media
"Outright fallacy.
News & Media
That's another fallacy.
News & Media
This is a fallacy.
News & Media
That was a fallacy.
News & Media
That's a fallacy.
News & Media
See also naturalistic fallacy.
Encyclopedias
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Use "gross fallacy" to emphasize a particularly egregious or obvious error in reasoning. Ensure the context clearly indicates that the fallacy is not just incorrect but also significantly flawed.
Common error
Avoid using "gross fallacy" when a simpler term like "mistake" or "misunderstanding" would suffice. Overusing strong language can dilute its impact, reserve "gross fallacy" for situations where the error is truly substantial and detrimental.
Source & Trust
94%
Authority and reliability
4.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "gross fallacy" functions as a noun phrase where "gross" modifies "fallacy". It acts as a descriptor, indicating a significant error in reasoning. Ludwig AI confirms its usability and meaning.
Frequent in
News & Media
60%
Science
20%
Encyclopedias
20%
Less common in
Formal & Business
0%
Wiki
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "gross fallacy" is used to describe a significant error in reasoning. Ludwig AI confirms that it is grammatically correct and emphasizes a substantial flaw in logic. While not frequently used, it appears in news media, scientific discussions, and encyclopedic contexts. Alternatives include "egregious misconception" and "palpable falsehood". When using this phrase, ensure the context accurately reflects a severe error, as overusing it can diminish its impact.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
egregious misconception
Replaces "fallacy" with "misconception" and "gross" with "egregious", emphasizing the severity of the misunderstanding.
palpable falsehood
Substitutes "fallacy" with "falsehood" and "gross" with "palpable", highlighting the obvious nature of the untruth.
major delusion
Replaces "fallacy" with "delusion", suggesting a deeply ingrained and unrealistic belief, and "gross" with "major", stressing the extent.
serious misjudgment
Replaces "fallacy" with "misjudgment", focusing on the error in decision-making or assessment, and "gross" with "serious", specifying the importance.
fundamental error
Substitutes "gross fallacy" with "fundamental error", pinpointing a basic and critical mistake.
significant misconception
Replaces "gross" with "significant", emphasizing the importance of the misconception without necessarily implying severity.
blatant untruth
Replaces "fallacy" with "untruth" and "gross" with "blatant", stressing the obvious and shameless nature of the lie.
complete misunderstanding
Replaces "gross fallacy" with "complete misunderstanding", emphasizing the thoroughness of the lack of comprehension.
evident logical error
Substitutes "gross fallacy" with "evident logical error", focusing on the flaw in reasoning that is easily noticeable.
grave misapprehension
Replaces "fallacy" with "misapprehension" and "gross" with "grave", emphasizing the seriousness and consequence of the misunderstanding.
FAQs
How can I use "gross fallacy" in a sentence?
You can use "gross fallacy" to describe a severe error in reasoning or a significant misunderstanding. For instance: "The politician's argument was based on a "gross fallacy" about the economy."
What are some alternatives to "gross fallacy"?
Alternatives include "egregious misconception", "palpable falsehood", or "major delusion", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.
Is "gross fallacy" a formal or informal term?
"Gross fallacy" is suitable for both formal and informal contexts, although it's more common in analytical or critical discussions. Its impact lies in emphasizing the magnitude of the error.
What makes a fallacy "gross"?
A "gross" fallacy implies that the error is not only incorrect but also glaringly obvious or significantly impactful. It suggests a fundamental flaw in the reasoning process.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
94%
Authority and reliability
4.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested