Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
grave inadequacies
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "grave inadequacies" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe serious or significant shortcomings or deficiencies in a particular context, such as a report, evaluation, or analysis. Example: "The audit revealed grave inadequacies in the company's financial reporting practices that need immediate attention."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Science
Encyclopedias
Alternative expressions(3)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
1 human-written examples
These scores reflect grave inadequacies of health research training at medical schools across the country.
Science
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
59 human-written examples
"Today's grave news exposes the inadequacy of Europe's response to the refugee crisis on the Mediterranean".
News & Media
Our own inadequacies, obviously.
News & Media
Your inadequacies reeked.
News & Media
Dickens never mentioned these inadequacies.
Encyclopedias
The grave.
News & Media
There were inexcusable security inadequacies in Libya.
News & Media
How grave is too grave?
News & Media
Today, such inadequacies are endemic.
News & Media
My father's grave.
News & Media
Before the Grave Q.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "grave inadequacies", ensure the context clearly establishes the severity of the shortcomings being described. This phrase is best suited for situations where the deficiencies have significant consequences.
Common error
Avoid using "grave inadequacies" in situations where the shortcomings are minor or easily rectified. Overusing strong language can dilute its impact when describing truly critical issues.
Source & Trust
88%
Authority and reliability
4.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "grave inadequacies" functions as a noun phrase where the adjective "grave" modifies the noun "inadequacies". It is used to describe serious or significant shortcomings, as confirmed by Ludwig AI. The examples in Ludwig highlight its use in contexts where deficiencies have notable consequences.
Frequent in
News & Media
37%
Science
37%
Encyclopedias
8%
Less common in
Formal & Business
6%
Wiki
3%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "grave inadequacies" is a phrase used to describe serious shortcomings or deficiencies. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and usability. While not frequently encountered, its use is appropriate when emphasizing the severity of specific issues. It is best suited for formal or professional contexts and found most commonly in News & Media and Science sources. When using this phrase, ensure that the context clearly supports the gravity of the situation. Alternatives such as ""serious deficiencies"" or ""critical shortcomings"" can be considered depending on the intended nuance.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
serious deficiencies
Replaces "inadequacies" with "deficiencies" and "grave" with "serious", altering the vocabulary while keeping a similar connotation of severity.
critical shortcomings
Substitutes "inadequacies" with "shortcomings" and "grave" with "critical", highlighting significant flaws or failures.
severe failings
Replaces "inadequacies" with "failings" and "grave" with "severe", emphasizing the intensity of the flaws.
major weaknesses
Replaces "inadequacies" with "weaknesses" and "grave" with "major", pointing out substantial areas of vulnerability.
significant limitations
Substitutes "inadequacies" with "limitations" and "grave" with "significant", underscoring considerable constraints or restrictions.
profound deficiencies
Replaces "grave" with "profound", suggesting deep-seated or far-reaching inadequacies.
dire shortcomings
Replaces "grave" with "dire", indicating extremely serious or urgent shortcomings.
acute failings
Replaces "grave" with "acute", highlighting the sharp and intense nature of the failings.
substantial flaws
Replaces "inadequacies" with "flaws" and "grave" with "substantial", indicating significant imperfections or faults.
deep-seated problems
Uses a more descriptive phrase to convey underlying and significant inadequacies.
FAQs
How can I use "grave inadequacies" in a sentence?
You can use "grave inadequacies" to describe serious shortcomings or deficiencies, such as: "The report revealed "grave inadequacies" in the safety protocols."
What are some alternatives to "grave inadequacies"?
Some alternatives to "grave inadequacies" include "serious deficiencies", "critical shortcomings", or "severe failings". The best choice depends on the specific nuance you want to convey.
When is it appropriate to use the phrase "grave inadequacies"?
It is appropriate to use "grave inadequacies" when describing shortcomings that are serious, significant, and have potentially severe consequences. Consider whether alternatives like "major weaknesses" might be more fitting if the situation is less critical.
What distinguishes "grave inadequacies" from "minor flaws"?
"Grave inadequacies" implies a high degree of severity and potential for negative impact, whereas "minor flaws" suggests less significant issues that are easily overlooked or corrected. It's a matter of scale, one is a "serious deficiency" and the other is a smaller issue.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
88%
Authority and reliability
4.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested