gratuitous modifications

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "gratuitous modifications" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe changes or alterations that are unnecessary or excessive, often in a context where such modifications do not add value. Example: "The report was filled with gratuitous modifications that only served to confuse the reader."

✓ Grammatically correct

Academia

Formal & Business

News & Media

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

Gratuitous, too.

The New York Times

Note that gratuitous "lamely".

The New York Times - Books

Or gratuitous?

The Guardian

Stark, gratuitous.

The Guardian

Also disable Gratuitous Address Resolution Protocol (ARP).

Securing VOIP Keeping your VOIP Network Safe

"They are not gratuitous.

Independent

It's just gratuitous.

Independent

Literature is necessarily gratuitous.

Independent

Adding Glass felt gratuitous.

The New York Times

It was gratuitous.

The New York Times

But maybe not gratuitous.

The Washington Post

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "gratuitous modifications", ensure that the modifications genuinely add no value or are excessive for the context. Provide clear justification why they are unnecessary.

Common error

Avoid using "gratuitous modifications" merely as a sophisticated substitute for "unnecessary changes". Use it when the excessiveness is particularly striking or adds a specific nuance to the criticism.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "gratuitous modifications" functions as a noun phrase, where "gratuitous" acts as a descriptive adjective modifying the noun "modifications". The adjective emphasizes that the modifications are excessive or unnecessary.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "gratuitous modifications" describes changes that are considered unnecessary or excessive. While examples are currently unavailable in Ludwig, the phrase itself is grammatically correct and usable. Ludwig AI indicates it follows standard grammar rules. The related phrases offer alternatives that emphasize the lack of necessity or excessiveness of the changes. When using this phrase, ensure it accurately reflects the unwarranted nature of the modifications and avoid overusing it as a simple substitute for "unnecessary changes".

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

gratuitous alterations

Synonymous, simply replacing "modifications" with "alterations".

unnecessary alterations

Emphasizes the lack of necessity in the changes.

redundant changes

Highlights the repetitive and superfluous nature of the modifications.

superfluous revisions

Stresses that the revisions are beyond what is required.

excessive adjustments

Focuses on the adjustments being beyond a reasonable amount.

needless amendments

Highlights the lack of need for the amendments made.

unwarranted modifications

Indicates that the modifications are not justified.

unessential revisions

Highlights that the revisions are not essential or crucial.

pointless changes

Emphasizes the lack of purpose or value in the changes.

extra modifications

Suggests the modifications are more than what is reasonably needed.

FAQs

How can I use "gratuitous modifications" in a sentence?

You can use "gratuitous modifications" to describe changes that are unnecessary or excessive. For example, "The report was filled with "gratuitous modifications" that only served to confuse the reader".

What are some alternatives to "gratuitous modifications"?

Alternatives include "unnecessary alterations", "redundant changes", or "superfluous revisions". The best choice depends on the specific nuance you want to convey.

What does "gratuitous" mean in the context of "gratuitous modifications"?

In this context, "gratuitous" means excessive, uncalled for, or lacking good reason. It implies the modifications are not only unnecessary but also potentially disruptive or wasteful.

Is there a difference between "gratuitous modifications" and "unnecessary modifications"?

While similar, "gratuitous modifications" carries a stronger connotation of excessiveness and lack of justification compared to "unnecessary modifications". "Gratuitous" suggests the changes are particularly unwarranted.