Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
got funded from
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "got funded from" is not standard in written English; it would be better to use "was funded by" or "received funding from." You can use it when discussing the source of financial support for a project or initiative, but it is more informal.
Example: "The startup got funded from several angel investors who believed in its potential."
Science
News & Media
Alternative expressions(4)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
1 human-written examples
You may already participated in this IYCF counseling session, which have been provided for free so far because we got funded from the Alive & Thrive project.
Science
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
59 human-written examples
She worked hard – copying out worksheets by hand – and eventually got funding from the Pakistani government.
News & Media
(The company eventually got funding from a top venture firm).
News & Media
"No, I didn't, but I still got funding from MIT.
News & Media
Ahmat was accepted to do a Ph.D. at the Dunn School of Pathology in Oxford and got funding from the Malaysian Ministry of Science, Technology, and Innovation.
Science & Research
While she was there, the university got funding from NIH to send postdoc students to teach at small local colleges with high minority enrollment.
Science & Research
When we got funding from Kleiner Perkins, our partner Vinod Khosla recommended we switch to a different partner at the same firm.
News & Media
"We got funding from the Ontario Arts Council to help get the project on its feet.
News & Media
We got funding from the Direct-MS charity to study 20 people.
News & Media
Our funding came from individuals, and then ultimately we got funding from a church pension fund, endowments -- I think our largest single investor group were endowments from colleges.
News & Media
Majority of researchers had done clinical trials, got funding from UN and multilateral agencies, and their primary audiences were the funding agencies.
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
While grammatically acceptable, consider using more formal alternatives like "was funded by" or "received funding from" in academic or professional writing.
Common error
Avoid using the phrase "got funded from" in contexts where a higher level of formality is expected. Opt for alternatives such as "received funding from" or "was financed by" to maintain a professional tone.
Source & Trust
86%
Authority and reliability
3.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "got funded from" functions as a verb phrase indicating the act of receiving financial support from a particular source. As Ludwig AI suggests, it is an informal way of expressing that something or someone received financial backing.
Frequent in
News & Media
65%
Science
30%
Formal & Business
5%
Less common in
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "got funded from" is an informal way to express that something received financial support from a particular source. Ludwig AI suggests that more formal alternatives like "received funding from" or "was funded by" are preferable in academic and professional contexts. While the phrase is understandable, it is considered less polished than its counterparts. Its frequency is uncommon. The primary contexts where "got funded from" appears are News & Media and Science. Therefore, writers should consider their audience and the level of formality required when choosing to use this phrase.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
received funding from
A more formal and direct way of stating the source of funding.
was financed by
Indicates that the project or entity's activities were supported financially.
obtained financial support from
Highlights the act of acquiring monetary assistance.
secured funding from
Emphasizes the effort involved in getting the funds.
benefited from funding by
Focuses on the advantage gained from the funding.
garnered funds from
Suggests a more active or successful fundraising effort.
was granted funding by
Highlights that the funding was awarded through a grant.
attracted investment from
Specifically refers to funding that is considered an investment.
had backing from
A more informal way to indicate financial support.
was sponsored by
Implies that the funding came from a sponsor, often for promotional reasons.
FAQs
What are some alternatives to "got funded from" that sound more formal?
More formal alternatives include "received funding from", "was funded by", or "obtained funding from".
Is "got funded from" grammatically incorrect?
While not strictly incorrect, "got funded from" is considered informal. It's generally better to use more formal phrasings like "was funded by" or "received funding from", especially in academic or professional contexts.
When is it appropriate to use "got funded from"?
"Got funded from" is appropriate in informal settings or casual conversations. However, in formal writing, it's advisable to use alternatives like "received funding from".
What's the difference between "got funded from" and "was funded by"?
The main difference is the level of formality. "Got funded from" is informal, while "was funded by" is more formal and suitable for professional or academic writing. Both indicate the source of financial support.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
86%
Authority and reliability
3.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested