good for everyone

USAGE SUMMARY

"good for everyone" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you want to express something that is beneficial or advantageous for everyone. For example, "The new tax plan will be good for everyone since it will create jobs."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

57 human-written examples

That's good for everyone".

The New York Times

"It's good for everyone.

The New York Times

"But good for everyone, too.

The Economist

Commenting is good for everyone.

The New York Times

That is good for everyone.

The Economist

He's been really good for everyone.

Independent

Free trade was good for everyone.

The New Yorker

It is good for everyone," he said.

The New York Times

And that's good for everyone".

The New York Times

"Booms aren't good for everyone.

The New York Times

It's good for everyone to have that.

The New York Times - Sports

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using the phrase "good for everyone", ensure the context clearly defines 'everyone.' Is it a local community, a specific group, or the global population? Clarity prevents misinterpretation.

Common error

Avoid using "good for everyone" when the benefits are limited or have potential drawbacks for some. Acknowledge potential exceptions or limitations to maintain credibility.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "good for everyone" acts as an adjective phrase modifying a noun or pronoun. It describes the state of being advantageous or beneficial to all individuals involved. According to Ludwig, the phrase is used to express something that benefits all parties involved.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

88%

Formal & Business

7%

Science

5%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "good for everyone" is a common and grammatically correct expression used to describe situations that are beneficial for all involved. Ludwig AI confirms its usability in various contexts. While frequently found in news and media, it's important to use it accurately, ensuring the benefits truly extend to 'everyone' without overgeneralization. Alternatives like "beneficial to all" or "in everyone's best interest" can provide nuanced expressions of the same concept.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

beneficial to all

Replaces "good" with "beneficial", emphasizing the positive impact on everyone.

is for the common good

Highlights that something is advantageous to the population.

advantages all

Uses "advantages" as a verb to show that everyone gains something positive.

in everyone's best interest

Focuses on the alignment with the well-being and benefit of each individual.

serves everyone well

Highlights the idea of providing a useful or helpful service to all.

a boon to all

Replaces "good" with "a boon", indicating a positive and helpful benefit.

works to everyone's advantage

Emphasizes the functional aspect of providing an advantage to each person.

is a plus for all

Uses "a plus" to signify a beneficial or advantageous outcome.

helps everyone prosper

Focuses on the idea of facilitating growth, success, and well-being for everyone.

favors all individuals

Highlights that each person receives preferential treatment or benefit.

FAQs

How can I use "good for everyone" in a sentence?

Use "good for everyone" to describe something that benefits all parties involved, like "The new recycling program is "good for everyone" because it reduces waste and protects the environment."

What are some alternatives to saying "good for everyone"?

Instead of saying "good for everyone", consider using phrases like "beneficial to all", "in everyone's best interest", or "for the common good" depending on the nuance you wish to convey.

Is it always accurate to say something is "good for everyone"?

While "good for everyone" suggests universal benefit, it's important to consider potential exceptions. Sometimes, a more nuanced statement acknowledging limitations is more accurate and credible.

What's the difference between "good for everyone" and "good for most people"?

"Good for everyone" implies a benefit that extends to every single individual, while "good for most people" suggests the benefits are widespread but not necessarily universal. The choice depends on the accuracy of the claim.