glaring shortcomings

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "glaring shortcomings" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe obvious or significant flaws or deficiencies in something, such as a plan, product, or performance. Example: "The report highlighted the glaring shortcomings in the company's safety protocols, prompting immediate action from management."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Sport

Technology

Books

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

18 human-written examples

Then there's one of modern rock's most glaring shortcomings.

The Guardian - Music

With its glaring shortcomings, the bill is widely expected to fail, yet Senator Frist presses ahead.

The New York Times

If Stuxnet is the latest example of what a government organization can do, it contains some glaring shortcomings.

The New York Times - Tech

Fuel derived from corn has channeled billions in subsidies to Midwestern farmers and agribusiness, he writes, despite glaring shortcomings.

The New York Times - Books

Second, Warburton's recruitment has been highly questionable, his failure to address glaring shortcomings in central defence incredible for a manager of his ability.

The Guardian - Sport

That Strachan lacks even a single world-class talent is without question but there have still been glaring shortcomings against mediocre opposition.

The Guardian - Sport

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

41 human-written examples

But for the true connoisseur of indulgence, even the most perfectly situated tub tends to have one glaring shortcoming: the music-listening issue.

The New York Times - Tech

Richard Dicker, a director of Human Rights Watch, said by telephone that there were still "glaring human rights shortcomings" in the statute of the Iraqi tribunal.

The New York Times

With three teams in the N.C.A.A. tournament, the Atlantic 10 has become more competitive, making Fordham's shortcomings more glaring.

The New York Times - Sports

As more governments and private entities seek to understand and harness the technology, their shortcomings become more glaring.

TechCrunch

The problems were glaring.

The New Yorker

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When writing about sensitive or potentially controversial topics, consider whether "glaring shortcomings" might be perceived as overly judgmental. Alternatives like "significant limitations" or "noticeable imperfections" may offer a more neutral tone while still conveying the core message.

Common error

Avoid using "glaring shortcomings" when a more neutral description is appropriate. While it's effective for highlighting significant issues, overuse can make your writing sound overly critical or biased. In less serious contexts, consider using milder terms like "noticeable limitations" or "evident areas for improvement".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "glaring shortcomings" functions as a noun phrase modifier. The adjective "glaring" intensifies the noun "shortcomings", emphasizing the obviousness and significance of the deficiencies. Ludwig AI confirms its correct usage, evidenced by the examples found across diverse sources.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

52%

Sport

12%

Technology

9%

Less common in

Science

9%

Formal & Business

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "glaring shortcomings" is a phrase used to describe obvious and significant flaws. Ludwig AI confirms that it is correct and commonly used in English, particularly in news, sports, and technology contexts. While grammatically sound, it's important to use it judiciously, considering its critical tone. Alternatives like "obvious deficiencies" or "significant limitations" may be more appropriate in neutral contexts. By understanding its function, purpose, and appropriate register, you can effectively use "glaring shortcomings" to enhance your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

obvious deficiencies

Focuses on the clarity and ease of noticing the deficiencies.

evident flaws

Highlights the readily apparent nature of the flaws.

conspicuous defects

Emphasizes the striking and easily visible nature of the defects, more formal.

flagrant weaknesses

Suggests the weaknesses are not only obvious but also deliberately or shockingly apparent.

major failings

Indicates significant failures or areas where something falls short.

significant limitations

Highlights the restrictions or boundaries that negatively impact something's potential or effectiveness.

noticeable imperfections

Draws attention to specific imperfections that stand out.

patent inadequacies

Stresses the undeniable and obvious nature of the inadequacies.

pronounced vulnerabilities

Highlights the significant and exposed nature of the vulnerabilities.

critical vulnerabilities

Highlights the vulnerabilities' critical nature and significant impact.

FAQs

How can I use "glaring shortcomings" in a sentence?

You can use "glaring shortcomings" to point out obvious flaws in something. For example, "The project proposal had "glaring shortcomings" in its financial planning".

What are some alternatives to saying "glaring shortcomings"?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives such as "obvious deficiencies", "evident flaws", or "significant limitations". These options vary in intensity and formality.

What makes "glaring shortcomings" different from "minor imperfections"?

"Glaring shortcomings" emphasizes the severity and obviousness of the flaws, while "minor imperfections" suggests small, less significant issues. The choice depends on the magnitude of the problems you're describing.

Is it appropriate to use "glaring shortcomings" in formal writing?

Yes, "glaring shortcomings" can be used in formal writing, especially when you need to critically assess something and highlight significant problems. However, be mindful of the tone and consider whether a more neutral phrase like "significant limitations" might be more appropriate.