glaring overlaps

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "glaring overlaps" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe obvious or significant similarities or duplications between two or more things, such as ideas, concepts, or data. Example: "In the analysis of the two reports, there were glaring overlaps in the findings that could not be ignored."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

Several glaring overlaps and strategic differences will need early attention.

The Economist

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

QUESTION FROM ELI: Are the major NGO's successfully coordinating aid with each other and the government of Haiti, or is there a lot of wasteful overlap and glaring holes in coverage areas?

The New Yorker

JON LEE ANDERSON: To answer you briefly and to the point — no, they are not satisfactorily coordinating, to my knowledge, and yes, there is a lot of wasteful overlap and glaring holes.

The New Yorker

The problems were glaring.

The New Yorker

The injustice is glaring".

The New York Times

Glaring at her.

The New Yorker

The changes are glaring.

The New York Times - Sports

The irony was glaring.

The New York Times

It is a glaring omission.

The New York Times

There are two glaring deficits.

The Economist

But there are glaring omissions.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "glaring overlaps" when you want to emphasize that the overlaps are easily noticeable and potentially problematic or inefficient.

Common error

Avoid using "glaring overlaps" when you only mean 'obvious overlaps'. "Glaring" suggests the overlaps are not only noticeable but also create an undesirable effect, such as redundancy or conflict.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "glaring overlaps" functions as a noun phrase, typically serving as the subject or object of a sentence. Ludwig AI validates its correct usage, often describing easily noticeable and problematic redundancies or similarities.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

100%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Science

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "glaring overlaps" is a noun phrase used to describe easily noticeable and often problematic redundancies or similarities. Ludwig AI indicates its usage is grammatically correct, though relatively rare. It's most frequently found in news and media contexts, carrying a neutral to professional tone. The phrase is used to highlight potential inefficiencies and conflicts, making it suitable for discussions needing clarity and directness. While alternatives like "obvious redundancies" or "striking duplications" exist, "glaring overlaps" specifically emphasizes the undesirable nature of the redundancies.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

obvious redundancies

Replaces "glaring" with "obvious" and "overlaps" with "redundancies", emphasizing the unnecessary repetition.

striking duplications

Emphasizes the surprising nature of the duplication, changing "glaring" to "striking" and "overlaps" to "duplications".

clear intersections

Focuses on the points where things meet or cross, instead of the duplication.

significant concurrence

Highlights the agreement or correspondence between elements, rather than the overlapping nature.

noticeable superimpositions

Draws attention to elements lying on top of each other, making them appear as one.

evident parallelisms

Underscores the similarities and resemblances between the different elements.

apparent convergence

Focuses on the act of coming together or merging, instead of emphasizing the overlaps.

manifest duplications

Highlights the readily perceived nature of the duplications, while also underscoring the act of copying.

palpable intersections

Refers to intersections that are easily perceived or felt, not just seen, highlighting its tangible nature.

conspicuous similarities

Emphasizes the obvious and easily noticeable resemblances, using "conspicuous" instead of "glaring".

FAQs

How can I use "glaring overlaps" in a sentence?

You can use "glaring overlaps" to describe obvious and often problematic redundancies or similarities between different elements. For instance, "The report revealed "glaring overlaps" in the responsibilities of the two departments, leading to confusion and inefficiency."

What are some alternatives to "glaring overlaps"?

Alternatives include "obvious redundancies", "striking duplications", or "clear intersections". The best choice depends on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it always negative to have "glaring overlaps"?

While often negative, implying inefficiency or conflict, "glaring overlaps" can sometimes highlight unexpected connections or reinforce important themes. However, the phrase usually carries a negative connotation.

What's the difference between "glaring overlaps" and "slight overlaps"?

"Glaring overlaps" indicate significant and easily noticeable areas of duplication or similarity, whereas "slight overlaps" suggest minor or less prominent connections. The former implies a potential problem, while the latter may be inconsequential.