glaring insufficiencies

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "glaring insufficiencies" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe obvious or significant shortcomings in a particular context, such as a report, analysis, or evaluation. Example: "The audit revealed glaring insufficiencies in the company's financial reporting practices."

✓ Grammatically correct

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

The problems were glaring.

The New Yorker

The injustice is glaring".

The New York Times

Glaring at her.

The New Yorker

The changes are glaring.

The New York Times - Sports

The irony was glaring.

The New York Times

It is a glaring omission.

The New York Times

The gap is becoming glaring.

The Economist

Glaring errors jostle quiet omissions.

The New Yorker

Mistakes are plentiful and glaring.

The New York Times - Magazine

There are two glaring deficits.

The Economist

But there are glaring omissions.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "glaring insufficiencies", ensure the context clearly establishes what the insufficiencies are and why they are considered 'glaring'. Be specific to maximize impact.

Common error

Avoid using "glaring insufficiencies" when the shortcomings are not truly significant or impactful. Overusing the phrase can dilute its effectiveness and credibility.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "glaring insufficiencies" functions as a noun phrase, where 'glaring' acts as a descriptive adjective modifying the noun 'insufficiencies'. It emphasizes the obvious and significant nature of the shortcomings. Ludwig AI confirms its usability in written English.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "glaring insufficiencies" is a grammatically correct phrase used to describe significant and obvious shortcomings. While Ludwig AI confirms its usability, the phrase is currently lacking real-world examples in the provided data, resulting in a 'Missing' frequency rating. It's best suited for professional and formal contexts where highlighting significant inadequacies is crucial. Alternatives include "obvious inadequacies" and "evident shortcomings". When using this phrase, ensure the context clearly defines the insufficiencies and their impact to maintain credibility.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

obvious inadequacies

Replaces "insufficiencies" with "inadequacies" and "glaring" with "obvious", maintaining a similar emphasis on easily noticeable deficiencies.

evident shortcomings

Substitutes "insufficiencies" with "shortcomings" and "glaring" with "evident", highlighting apparent weaknesses.

noticeable deficiencies

Replaces "insufficiencies" with "deficiencies" and "glaring" with "noticeable", emphasizing the ease with which the problems can be observed.

conspicuous lapses

Uses "lapses" to replace "insufficiencies" and "conspicuous" instead of "glaring", shifting the focus to failures or omissions that are very apparent.

marked deficits

Replaces "insufficiencies" with "deficits" and "glaring" with "marked", indicating clearly defined shortages or lacks.

palpable absences

Replaces "insufficiencies" with "absences" and "glaring" with "palpable", suggesting that what is missing is almost tangible or easily sensed.

striking omissions

Substitutes "insufficiencies" with "omissions" and "glaring" with "striking", drawing attention to notable exclusions or oversights.

pronounced weaknesses

Replaces "insufficiencies" with "weaknesses" and "glaring" with "pronounced", indicating very noticeable areas of vulnerability.

critical gaps

Uses "gaps" to replace "insufficiencies" and "critical" instead of "glaring", emphasizing the serious nature of the missing elements.

major failings

Replaces "insufficiencies" with "failings" and "glaring" with "major", highlighting significant instances of not meeting expectations.

FAQs

How can I use "glaring insufficiencies" in a sentence?

You can use "glaring insufficiencies" to highlight significant shortcomings or deficits in a particular situation. For example, "The report revealed "glaring insufficiencies" in the project's planning phase".

What can I say instead of "glaring insufficiencies"?

Alternatives to "glaring insufficiencies" include "obvious inadequacies", "evident shortcomings", or "noticeable deficiencies", depending on the context.

Which is correct, "glaring insufficiencies" or "glaring deficiencies"?

Both "glaring insufficiencies" and "glaring deficiencies" are grammatically correct and can be used interchangeably, although "insufficiencies" might imply a slightly broader or more fundamental lack.

What's the difference between "glaring insufficiencies" and "minor shortcomings"?

"Glaring insufficiencies" emphasize significant and easily noticeable problems, while "minor shortcomings" refer to smaller, less impactful issues. The choice depends on the severity of the problems you're describing.