Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
get confused with
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
"get confused with" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
You can use it when you want to indicate that somebody has incorrectly associated one thing with another. For example: "People often get confused with the names of these two cities – Tokyo and Osaka."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Science
Academia
Wiki
Alternative expressions(20)
mistake for
conflate with
mix up with
identify incorrectly as
erroneously associate with
equate with
blur the lines between
lump together with
get confounded with
get complicated with
be confused with
have confused with
get flustered with
get concerned with
get connected with
get lost with
get muddled with
get conflated with
get restless with
am confused with
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
THE first-person narrators of debut novels invariably get confused with their authors, and the confusion here has been greater than most.
News & Media
Power tends to get confused with repression.
News & Media
"I get confused with all the terms," he said.
News & Media
They are not present in the data and often get confused with measurements.
Most likely to: Get confused with Alex Kingston.
News & Media
I get confused with City Councilman Bobby Shriver sometimes.
News & Media
But signals intended for one audience can sometimes get confused with signals intended for another.
Academia
And because collecting involves money, market values get confused with other concerns.
News & Media
Naturally, people get confused with all these voices shouting and hollering about how awful I am.
News & Media
What other species could they get confused with if they shed their heavy and costly burdens?
News & Media
Do you often get confused with the characters you portray, onscreen or on paper?
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "get confused with", ensure clarity by specifying both the subject being confused and what it is being confused with. For example: "Don't get 'affect' confused with 'effect'."
Common error
Avoid using "get confused with" without clearly stating what is being confused. For example, instead of saying "People get confused with this", specify "People get the rules confused with the guidelines."
Source & Trust
83%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "get confused with" functions as a linking verb connecting a subject with a state of confusion or misidentification. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is a valid English phrase. Examples show its utility in describing mistaken associations.
Frequent in
News & Media
40%
Academia
25%
Wiki
15%
Less common in
Science
10%
Formal & Business
5%
Reference
5%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "get confused with" is a versatile and commonly used phrase for indicating misidentification or misinterpretation. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, the phrase is grammatically sound and widely accepted in English writing. The phrase appears frequently in "news & media", academic and wiki sources, making it suitable for a wide range of contexts. When using this phrase, clarity is key: specify what is being confused and what it's being confused with to avoid ambiguity. Be also careful about similar phrases like "conflate with" or "mistake for", since they are not fully interchangeable.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
mistake for
Focuses on the act of incorrectly identifying something as something else.
conflate with
Implies a merging or blurring of distinct concepts, often leading to misinterpretation.
mix up with
Suggests a simple error in distinguishing between two or more things.
identify incorrectly as
Highlights the misidentification of a subject, specifying the incorrect label.
erroneously associate with
Emphasizes the incorrect connection made between two things based on misunderstanding.
equate with
Implies treating two distinct things as if they are the same or equivalent.
blur the lines between
Focuses on the lack of clear distinction between two concepts, leading to confusion.
lump together with
Suggests grouping separate items or concepts into a single undifferentiated category, often inappropriately.
misinterpret as
Highlights the incorrect understanding or perception of something.
wrongly assume to be
Focuses on the incorrect assumption of equivalence or identity between two things.
FAQs
How can I use "get confused with" in a sentence?
Use "get confused with" to indicate that someone is mixing up two distinct things. For example, "Many people "get confused with" correlation and causation."
What's a simple alternative to "get confused with"?
A simpler alternative to "get confused with" is to use the phrase "mistake for". For example, "They often mistake for each other."
How is "get confused with" different from "conflate with"?
"Get confused with" implies a simple error in distinguishing, while "conflate with" suggests a merging of two distinct concepts into one. "People often "get confused with" opinions and facts", but, "Some people conflate with wealth and success".
What is a common mistake to avoid when using "get confused with"?
A common mistake is not specifying what two things are being mixed up. Be clear: instead of "People get confused", say "People "get confused with" the terms 'affect' and 'effect'."
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
83%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested