generate harms

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "generate harms" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts discussing the creation or production of negative effects or consequences, often in relation to actions, policies, or technologies. Example: "The new policy may generate harms that outweigh its intended benefits."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

Nursing care services are provided to patients in an environment with complex interactions that can generate harm, errors and unintended outcomes.

BMC Nursing

Vasoactive medications, for example, are only of use in the septic patient with refractory hypotension, and mechanical ventilation does not help the patient without respiratory insufficiency; indeed, intervention in the absence of a clearly established need may generate harm.

Critical Care

I have argued for many years that human communication generates harm that is largely emotional and immaterial and that civil legal remedies and criminal sanctions should be proportionately restorative and avoid the temptation for popular penalism.

The Guardian

E. andrei earthworms act as indicators for a soil to support disposal of swine manure without generating harm to agriculture and ecosystems.

Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety

Surveys that perpetuate the myth that cybercrime makes for easy money are harmful because they encourage hopeful, if misinformed, new entrants, who generate more harm for users than profit for themselves.

The New York Times

As a result, the justice system can actually furthermore victimize children and generate more harm than redress.

Unicef

As noted, the benefits of the intervention appear to be substantial and the intervention generates no harms, other than cost of testing cigarettes to ensure compliance.

Injury Epidemiology

As they are often besieged from within and without, such governments use their monopoly of "legitimate" violence to suppress the trade, failing to produce the desired effect while generating multiple harms.

Huffington Post

(And which might disadvantage them or generate wider societal harms).

TechCrunch

"The attempt to prohibit people from using these substances generates ancillary harm.

BBC

As a result, justice systems sometimes end up generating further harm than redress.

Unicef

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "generate harms", ensure the context clearly establishes the cause-and-effect relationship. Specify what action or situation leads to the creation of negative outcomes to avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "generate harms" in contexts where the negative outcome is merely a potential risk, rather than a likely consequence. Use more tentative language if the causation is not well-established.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "generate harms" functions as a verb phrase where "generate" acts as a transitive verb, taking "harms" as its direct object. It describes the action of producing or causing negative consequences.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

35%

News & Media

33%

Formal & Business

32%

Less common in

Wiki

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "generate harms" is a grammatically correct and usable expression that describes the creation or causation of negative consequences. Though examples are scarce, Ludwig AI confirms its validity. It's best employed when a clear cause-and-effect relationship exists, specifying what actions lead to the production of the harm. Alternatives like "cause harm", "produce adverse effects", and "lead to negative outcomes" offer similar meanings with slight variations in nuance. While versatile, avoid overgeneralization and ensure the context supports the causal link. Its neutral to formal register makes it suitable for various sources, particularly in science, news, and formal business contexts.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

cause harm

This alternative replaces "generate" with "cause", directly indicating the act of producing harm.

create damage

This alternative uses "create" instead of "generate", and "damage" instead of "harm", emphasizing the act of producing destruction or injury.

produce adverse effects

This alternative is more formal, replacing "harms" with "adverse effects" to denote negative consequences.

result in detriment

This alternative uses "result in" to indicate causation, and "detriment" to denote a state of being harmed or damaged.

lead to negative outcomes

This alternative broadens the scope to any negative result, not just direct harm.

trigger negative consequences

This alternative emphasizes the initiation of a chain of negative events.

induce injury

This alternative is more specific, focusing on physical or emotional harm.

inflict damage

This alternative implies a deliberate or forceful causing of damage.

precipitate negative impact

This alternative suggests a sudden or hastened onset of negative effects.

foster detrimental effects

This alternative focuses on the nurturing or promotion of harmful outcomes.

FAQs

How can I use "generate harms" in a sentence?

You can use "generate harms" to describe situations where a particular action or policy leads to negative consequences. For example, "The proposed budget cuts could "generate harms" to public education."

What are some alternatives to "generate harms"?

Alternatives to "generate harms" include phrases like "cause harm", "produce adverse effects", or "lead to negative outcomes" depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it better to say "generate harm" or "generate harms"?

While "generate harm" is grammatically correct, "generate harms" is often used when referring to multiple types or instances of harm. The choice depends on whether you are discussing a singular, general concept of harm or specific, countable harms.

What is the difference between "generate harms" and "mitigate harms"?

"Generate harms" refers to the creation or production of negative consequences, whereas "mitigate harms" refers to actions taken to reduce or alleviate existing or potential negative consequences. They are opposite in meaning.