gaps in logic

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "gaps in logic" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to refer to inconsistencies or flaws in reasoning within an argument or explanation. Example: "The author's conclusion is flawed due to several gaps in logic that undermine the overall argument."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

17 human-written examples

The entrancing visual imagery goes a long way toward filling in the screenplay's gaps in logic.

The New York Times

There are gaps in logic big enough for Donnie Barksdale's pickup truck.

The New York Times

The plot was slightly predictable and clichéd and also had several gaps in logic.

The Guardian

Sentimentality is offset with wicked wit, and Brooker's brio and imagination paper over any gaps in logic.

The Guardian

The plot stumbles and jerks along, with gaps in logic and characters dropped, then suddenly remembered, or new ones invented at the last minute.

The New York Times - Books

(She's going to take a full year off? Her husband is a stay-at-home dad to their high-school-aged son? That son is dying for a baby sibling?) Even if that story didn't have gaps in logic, it would be a drag, the sort of subplot a pro like Messing's character would surely chop from her own production.

The New Yorker

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

40 human-written examples

There is a huge gap in logic at the heart of the Republican intransigence on a debt-ceiling deal, and President Obama helped to illuminate it on Monday.

The New York Times

Peer too closely and you start to see the wires holding the whole thing, the gaps in the logic and big black holes that lead nowhere at all.

The Guardian - Film

By providing access to the inner lives of characters, the novel allows us not only to see how these characters justify and rationalize their most troubling decisions, it also makes us aware of the gaps in their logic, and the moments when an old identity breaks down and a new one starts to take shape.

The New Yorker

Profits from insider trading once in office bridge that gap in the logic.

The New York Times

"Why would I not want to do this?" But as the lung scans are being promoted, one gap in the logic remains.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

In persuasive writing, anticipate and address potential "gaps in logic" to strengthen your argument's credibility.

Common error

Avoid leaving implicit assumptions unexamined, as these can create unseen "gaps in logic" that weaken your overall argument.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "gaps in logic" functions as a noun phrase, typically used as a subject or object to denote deficiencies or inconsistencies within a line of reasoning. Ludwig AI confirms its usability in written English.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

41%

Science

38%

Wiki

10%

Less common in

Formal & Business

3%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "gaps in logic" effectively identifies inconsistencies or deficiencies in reasoning. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, it is grammatically correct and usable across diverse contexts. Common usage appears in News & Media and Scientific domains, with related terms including "flaws in reasoning" and "logical fallacies". When writing, be sure to shore up any potential "gaps in logic" by thoroughly examining all implicit assumptions. By understanding and addressing these gaps, you can strengthen the clarity and persuasiveness of your arguments.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

flaws in reasoning

Highlights the presence of defects within a line of thought.

inconsistencies in reasoning

Emphasizes the lack of coherence or agreement within an argument.

reasoning errors

Indicates mistakes made during the process of forming conclusions.

defective reasoning

Suggests that the reasoning process is impaired or faulty.

fallacious arguments

Highlights arguments based on mistaken or unsound logic.

logical fallacies

Focuses specifically on identifiable patterns of flawed reasoning, a more technical term.

illogical leaps

Points out jumps in reasoning that aren't supported by evidence.

breaks in the chain of thought

Implies interruptions or disconnections in logical progression.

unfounded assumptions

Indicates reliance on premises that lack a solid basis or justification.

cognitive biases

Refers to systematic patterns of deviation from norm or rationality in judgment.

FAQs

How can I identify "gaps in logic" in my own writing?

Carefully review your arguments, looking for unsupported claims, inconsistencies, and areas where the connection between evidence and conclusion is weak. Ask others to critique your work to find areas you might have missed.

What are some common causes of "gaps in logic"?

Common causes include reliance on unproven assumptions, failure to consider alternative explanations, and jumping to conclusions without sufficient evidence. Be aware of "cognitive biases", which can also distort reasoning.

How do I fix "gaps in logic" once I've identified them?

Fill the "gaps" by providing additional evidence, clarifying your reasoning, addressing counterarguments, and ensuring that all assumptions are clearly stated and justified. If needed, revise your conclusion to align better with the available evidence.

What phrases can I use instead of "gaps in logic"?

Depending on the context, you could use phrases like "flaws in reasoning", "reasoning errors", or "inconsistencies in reasoning".