With all due respect, more distressing with the fourth domain argument from this particular referee is inconsistency in reasoning.
Kohlberg's theory is generally considered to be incompatible with inconsistencies in moral reasoning.
This view would allow for inconsistency in moral reasoning since individuals may be hampered by their inability to consider different perspectives.
They maintain that the application of this technique to increase students' reasoning ability while reading requires "assessing arguments and statements, deducing conclusions and hypotheses, detecting inconsistencies and common mistakes in reasoning, and making inferences" (p. 52).
Jonassen et al. (1998) claim that applying critical thinking while reading requires evaluating arguments and statements, deducing conclusions and hypotheses, noticing inconsistencies, and common mistakes in reasoning, and making inferences.
Additional general tasks are critical readers, whose task it is to follow in detail the written products of another team and to provide feedback indicating flaws in reasoning, inconsistencies, and aspects that require further clarification; editors, who are responsible for the written proposal; and, finally, students who will prepare the oral presentations for the jury.
The inconsistent effect of these tertiary determinants belies inconsistencies in staff perceptions and reasoning for why an incident reports should be recorded for a fall.
Their retrial came after prosecutors turned to the Supreme Court of Cassation, which cited inconsistencies in the Appeal Court's reasoning.
In a similar way, when a student shares experienced patterns or naïve explanations, directing him/her to the scientific observations would be the better way for him/her to discover the inconsistencies of his/her reasoning.
They are infants in reasoning.
Study and apply logic in reasoning.
